...
首页> 外文期刊>British Biotechnology Journal >DNA from Oral Rinse- A Comparison of Three Protocols for Amplification of VDR, FTO and Beta-Globin Genes
【24h】

DNA from Oral Rinse- A Comparison of Three Protocols for Amplification of VDR, FTO and Beta-Globin Genes

机译:口腔冲洗液中的DNA-三种扩增VDR,FTO和β-球蛋白基因方案的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different protocols for DNA extraction from oral rinse on the basis of their quantity and quality of DNA, simplicity, cost effectiveness and rapidity, as well as its efficiency for amplification of vitamin D receptor (VDR), Fat mass and obesity (FTO) and β-globin genes. Methodologies: The three methods included; Method 1 (organic solvent extraction), Method 2 (spin column) and Method 3 (ion-exchange extraction). DNA extracted from oral rinse was used for PCR amplification of β-globin, VDR-FOK1 and FTO gene. Results: The amplified products of 268bp (β-globin), 265bp (VDR-Fok1) and 182bp (FTO) were observed on HeroLab Gel doc system (Germany). Method 2 provided the average highest DNA yield (9.54±1.85 ng/μl) compared to 6.66±1.14 ng/μl and 7.57±0.96 ng/μl by method 1 and 3. Method 2 was found to have a better performance in terms of DNA quantity and quality, however, method 3 was the fastest and method 1 was the most cost effective methods but the PCR amplification from DNA from all three methods was the same. Conclusion: Oral rinse was found one of the alternative non-invasive sources for DNA extraction and is sufficient for good quality and quantity of DNA extracted by three different methods. It may be concluded that method 1 can be employed for large scale epidemiological and molecular biological studies.
机译:目的:研究的目的是根据三种冲洗液的DNA数量和质量,简便性,成本效益和快速性以及其扩增维生素D的效率来评估三种从口腔冲洗液中提取DNA的功效。受体(VDR),脂肪量和肥胖症(FTO)和β珠蛋白基因。方法:包括三种方法;方法1(有机溶剂萃取),方法2(旋转柱)和方法3(离子交换萃取)。从口腔冲洗液中提取的DNA用于PCR扩增β-珠蛋白,VDR-FOK1和FTO基因。结果:在HeroLab Gel doc系统(德国)上观察到268bp(β-球蛋白),265bp(VDR-Fok1)和182bp(FTO)的扩增产物。方法2提供了平均最高的DNA产量(9.54±1.85 ng /μl),而方法1和3则为6.66±1.14 ng /μl和7.57±0.96 ng /μl,发现方法2在DNA方面具有更好的性能从数量和质量上讲,方法3最快,而方法1是最具成本效益的方法,但是从这三种方法中DNA的PCR扩增均相同。结论:口腔冲洗被发现是DNA提取的另一种非侵入性来源,对于通过三种不同方法提取的高质量和高质量的DNA而言已足够。可以得出结论,方法1可用于大规模流行病学和分子生物学研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号