首页> 外文期刊>BioMedical Engineering OnLine >Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke
【24h】

Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke

机译:将机器人辅助康复服务转换为临床服务:比较EMG驱动的机器人手辅助上肢训练在实际临床服务和带有慢性卒中实验室配置的临床试验中的康复效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Rehabilitation robots can provide intensive physical training after stroke. However, variations of the rehabilitation effects in translation from well-controlled research studies to clinical services have not been well evaluated yet. This study aims to compare the rehabilitation effects of the upper limb training by an electromyography (EMG)-driven robotic hand achieved in a well-controlled research environment and in a practical clinical service. It was a non-randomized controlled trial, and thirty-two participants with chronic stroke were recruited either in the clinical service (n?=?16, clinic group), or in the research setting (n?=?16, lab group). Each participant received 20-session EMG-driven robotic hand assisted upper limb training. The training frequency (4 sessions/week) and the pace in a session were fixed for the lab group, while they were flexible (1–3 sessions/week) and adaptive for the clinic group. The training effects were evaluated before and after the treatment with clinical scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Significant improvements in the FMA full score, shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand (P?
机译:康复机器人可以在中风后提供密集的体育锻炼。然而,从良好控制的研究到临床服务的翻译中康复效果的变化尚未得到很好的评估。这项研究旨在比较在良好控制的研究环境中和在实际临床服务中通过肌电图(EMG)驱动的机械手对上肢训练的康复效果。这是一项非随机对照试验,并在临床服务(n = 16,临床组)或研究环境(n = 16,实验室组)中招募了32名慢性中风患者。 。每个参与者接受了20节EMG驱动的机器人手辅助上肢训练。实验室组的训练频率(每周4节)和每节的节奏是固定的,而灵活的(每周1–3节)和针对临床组的则是适应性的。在治疗前后,使用Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA),动作研究手臂测验(ARAT),功能独立性测量(FIM)和改良的Ashworth量表(MAS)的临床评分评估培训效果。两组训练后,观察到FMA满分,肩/肘和腕/手(P 0.001),ARAT(P 0.001)和MAS肘(P 0.05)有显着改善。 。 FIM(P 0.05),MAS手腕(P 0.001)和MAS手(P 0.05)的显着改善只有在临床组接受训练后才能获得。与实验组相比,临床组的FIM改善更高(P <0.05)。通过灵活的培训计划,即使每周的培训频率较低,临床服务中机器人手部训练后的功能改进也可与研究环境中的有效性相媲美。与实验组相比,临床组在日常生活中具有更高的独立性,并且在肌肉张力方面更有效地释放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号