首页> 外文期刊>Bratislava Medical Journal >Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: our experience and comparison with stereotactic automated needle biopsy
【24h】

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: our experience and comparison with stereotactic automated needle biopsy

机译:立体定向真空辅助乳房活检:我们的经验以及与立体定向自动穿刺活检的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcome of stereotactically guided percutaneous, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) with the outcome of those performed with 14-gauge automated gun.Methods: Between January 2008 and January 2011, altogether 257 stereotactic biopsies were performed in our institute; 193 with the 14-gauge automated needle and 64 with a directional, vacuum-assisted instrument.? Patients with malignant or high risk lesions were encouraged to undergo an excisional biopsy. We evaluated and compared concordance between the biopsy results and subsequent examinations (surgical excision or follow up) for both methods.Results: VAB demonstrated 57 (89 %) benign lesions, 2 (3 %) high risk and 5 (8 %) malignant lesions. We obtained post-bioptic mammographic or histological evaluation for altogether 51 lesions, with one (12.5 %) false negative case, one case of underestimation of borderline lesion, and no false positive cases. Clusters of microcalcifiation were completely removed in 18 lesions (28 %).Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted biopsy outperformed the 14-gauge automated needle biopsy with a lower disease underestimation, sensitivity and false-negative rates; however these differences were not statistically significant due to small data files and relatively small number of identified malignant lesions in the vacuum-assisted biopsy group.VAB completely removed significantly more clusters of microcalcifications in comparison to the automated needle biopsy, which significantly reduced the need for surgery in benign lesions (Tab. 7, Fig. 3, Ref. 32). Keywords: vacuum-assisted biopsy, breast lesions, mammographic, stereotactic Year: 2013, Volume: 114, Issue: 2 Page From: 71, Page To: 77 doi:10.4149/BLL_2013_017 download file ? AEPress s.r.o Copyright notice: For any permission to reproduce, archive or otherwise use the documents in the ELiS, please contact AEP.
机译:目的:评估和比较立体定向引导的经皮,定向,真空辅助乳腺活检(VAB)与采用14口径自动枪进行的活检的结果。方法:2008年1月至2011年1月,共进行257例立体定向活检在我们研究所表演; 193(带14针自动针)和64(带定向真空辅助仪器)。鼓励患有恶性或高风险病变的患者进行切除活检。我们评估并比较了两种方法的活检结果与后续检查(手术切除或随访)之间的一致性,结果:VAB证实有57个(89%)良性病变,2个(3%)高风险和5个(8%)恶性病变。我们对总共51处病变进行了活检后的乳房X线照片或组织学评估,其中1例(12.5%)假阴性病例,1例低估了边界病变,无假阳性病例。结论:真空辅助活检优于14口径自动穿刺活检,其疾病低估率,敏感性和假阴性率较低;微辅助钙化完全消除了18个病灶(28%)。但是,由于数据文件少和在真空辅助活检组中识别出的恶性病灶相对较少,这些差异在统计学上并不显着。与自动穿刺活检相比,VAB完全清除了更多的微钙化簇,从而显着减少了对良性病变的手术(表7,图3,参考文献32)。关键字:真空辅助活检,乳腺病变,乳腺钼靶,立体定位技术年份:2013,容量:114,发行:2 Page from:71,Page To:77 doi:10.4149 / BLL_2013_017下载文件? AEPress s.r.o版权声明:有关复制,存档或以其他方式使用ELiS中的文档的任何许可,请联系AEP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号