...
首页> 外文期刊>Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences >Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
【24h】

Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

机译:宫颈食管癌明确放疗或放化疗患者的结局和预后因素

获取原文

摘要

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of all esophageal cancers. The management of CEC is controversial. This study investigated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of survival in CEC patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Ninety-one CEC patients were treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) between July 2007 and September 2017. The mean prescription dose was 64 Gy (range 54-70 Gy) delivered as 1.8-2.2 Gy per fraction per day, 5 days a week. Out of 91 patients, 34 received concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) including 18 patients who also received neoadjuvant CT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors of survival were determined in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard model) analysis. Treatment-related toxicity was also assessed. Median follow-up time for all patients was 19 months. Two-year OS, LRFFS and PFS of all patients were 58.2%, 52.5% and 48.1%, respectively. Clinical stage was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.03-5.37, p = 0.042), LRFFS (HR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.38-10.69, p = 0.011), and PFS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.11-6.45, p = 0.028). Hoarseness was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.05-4.19, p = 0.036). CCRT was independently associated with better LRFFS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.79, p = 0.012). 3DCRT and IMRT with concurrent CT is well-tolerated and may improve local tumor control in CEC patients. Advanced clinical stage and hoarseness are adverse prognostic factors for OS, LRFFS, and PFS in CEC.
机译:宫颈食管癌(CEC)并不常见,占所有食道癌的不到5%。 CEC的管理存在争议。这项研究调查了接受定性放疗或同时放化疗的CEC患者的治疗结果和生存预后因素。在2007年7月至2017年9月之间,对91例CEC患者进行了调强放射治疗(IMRT)和三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)。平均处方剂量为64 Gy(范围54-70 Gy),分1.8每周5天每天-2.2 Gy。在91例患者中,有34例同时接受了基于顺铂的化疗(CT),其中18例患者也接受了新辅助CT。整体生存率(OS),局部无衰竭生存率(LRFFS)和无进展生存率(PFS)通过Kaplan-Meier方法估算。生存的预后因素在单因素(对数秩检验)和多元(Cox比例风险模型)分析中确定。还评估了与治疗相关的毒性。所有患者的中位随访时间为19个月。所有患者的两年OS,LRFFS和PFS分别为58.2%,52.5%和48.1%。临床分期是OS(HR = 2.35,95%CI:1.03-5.37,p = 0.042),LRFFS(HR = 3.84,95%CI:1.38-10.69,p = 0.011)和PFS(HR)的独立预后因素= 2.68,95%CI:1.11-6.45,p = 0.028)。声音嘶哑是OS的独立预后因素(HR = 2.10,95%CI:1.05-4.19,p = 0.036)。 CCRT与更好的LRFFS独立相关(HR = 0.33,95%CI:0.14-0.79,p = 0.012)。 3DCRT和IMRT并发CT耐受性良好,可能会改善CEC患者的局部肿瘤控制。临床晚期和声音嘶哑是CEC中OS,LRFFS和PFS的不良预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号