首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases >Gatifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonias: a comparative trial of ceftriaxone, with or without macrolides, in hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderately severe pneumonia
【24h】

Gatifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonias: a comparative trial of ceftriaxone, with or without macrolides, in hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderately severe pneumonia

机译:加替沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎:头孢曲松联合或不联合大环内酯类药物在轻度至中度重症肺炎住院成人患者中的比较试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Community-acquired pneumonia is very common, but some of the cases do require hospitalization for treatment, particularly when older patients and/or co-morbidities are involved; both "typical" and "atypical" respiratory pathogens take part etiologically, and there is increasing concern about the emergence of resistance. There is interest in therapeutic options that can: a) comprehend such a spectrum of bacteria and resistance; b) allow parenteral to oral sequential treatment. We made a multicenter, prospective and randomized trial to compare the "standard" treatment of ceftriaxone IV alone or in combination with erythromycin IV, followed by clarithromycin PO (ceftriaxone treatment arm), with gatifloxacin IV, followed by oral administration (gatifloxacin treatment arm). The need for hospitalization was based on clinical criteria as judged by the investigators. Standardized criteria for diagnosis and follow-up were employed. Fifty-six patients were enrolled, with 48% over 65 years old, and there were frequent co-morbidities. Of these, 51 were clinically evaluable, 26 in the gatifloxacin and 25 in the ceftriaxone arm, with comparable success rates, 92% and 88%, respectively, even when major prognostic factors were considered. There were no serious adverse events or significant laboratory value changes attributable to the study drugs. Gatifloxacin as monotherapy (initially IV then orally until completion of treatment) was shown to be effective and safe, comparable to ceftriaxone IV alone or in combination with a macrolide (initially IV then orally until completion of treatment), in empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonias, for patients that, at the physician s discretion, require initial treatment as inpatients.
机译:社区获得性肺炎非常普遍,但是某些情况下确实需要住院治疗,特别是在涉及老年患者和/或合并症的情况下; “典型”和“非典型”呼吸道病原体均在病因学上参与,并且人们越来越关注耐药性的出现。人们对以下治疗方法感兴趣:a)了解细菌和耐药性的范围; b)允许肠胃外至口服序贯治疗。我们进行了一项多中心,前瞻性和随机试验,比较了头孢曲松IV或与红霉素IV,克拉霉素PO(头孢曲松治疗组),加替沙星IV,然后口服(加替沙星治疗)的“标准”治疗。住院的需要是根据研究者的临床标准确定的。采用诊断和随访的标准化标准。共有56例患者入选,其中65%年龄以上的患者占48%,并发合并症。在这些因素中,即使考虑到主要的预后因素,在临床上也可以评估为51项,在加替沙星中为26项,在头孢曲松组中为25项,成功率相当,分别为92%和88%。没有可归因于研究药物的严重不良事件或重大实验室值变化。已证明加替沙星单药治疗(最初静脉输注然后口服直至治疗完成)是有效且安全的,在社区获得性经验治疗中,与单独使用头孢曲松IV或与大环内酯联用(最初静脉输注然后口服直至治疗完成)相当。对于肺炎,由医生酌情决定是否需要住院患者进行初始治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号