首页> 外文期刊>Brain Sciences >Using “Functional” Target Coordinates of the Subthalamic Nucleus to Assess the Indirect and Direct Methods of the Preoperative Planning: Do the Anatomical and Functional Targets Coincide?
【24h】

Using “Functional” Target Coordinates of the Subthalamic Nucleus to Assess the Indirect and Direct Methods of the Preoperative Planning: Do the Anatomical and Functional Targets Coincide?

机译:使用丘脑底核的“功能”目标坐标来评估术前计划的间接和直接方法:解剖和功能目标是否一致?

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To answer the question of whether the anatomical center of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), as calculated indirectly from stereotactic atlases or by direct visualization on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), corresponds to the best functional target. Since the neighboring red nucleus (RN) is well visualized on MRI, we studied the relationships of the final target to its different borders. Methods: We analyzed the data of 23 PD patients (46 targets) who underwent bilateral frame-based STN deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedure with microelectrode recording guidance. We calculated coordinates of the active contact on DBS electrode on postoperative MRI, which we referred to as the final “functional/optimal” target. The coordinates calculated by the atlas-based “indirect” and “direct” methods, as well as the coordinates of the different RN borders were compared to these final coordinates. Results: The mean ± SD of the final target coordinates was 11.7 ± 1.5 mm lateral (X), 2.4 ± 1.5 mm posterior (Y), and 6.1 ± 1.7 mm inferior to the mid-commissural point (Z). No significant differences were found between the “indirect” X, Z coordinates and those of the final targets. The “indirect” Y coordinate was significantly posterior to Y of the final target, with mean difference of 0.6 mm ( p = 0.014). No significant differences were found between the “direct” X, Y, and Z coordinates and those of the final targets. Conclusions: The functional STN target is located in direct proximity to its anatomical center. During preoperative targeting, we recommend using the “direct” method, and taking into consideration the relationships of the final target to the mid-commissural point (MCP) and the different RN borders.
机译:目的:回答以下问题:丘脑底核(STN)的解剖中心是通过立体定位图谱间接计算还是通过磁共振成像(MRI)直接可视化计算,是否对应于最佳功能目标。由于在MRI上可以很好地观察到相邻的红色核(RN),因此我们研究了最终目标与其不同边界的关系。方法:我们分析了23例PD患者(46个目标)的数据,这些患者在微电极记录指导下接受了基于双侧框架的STN深部脑刺激(DBS)程序。我们计算了术后MRI上DBS电极上的活动触点的坐标,我们将其称为最终的“功能/最佳”目标。将基于图集的“间接”和“直接”方法计算的坐标以及不同RN边界的坐标与这些最终坐标进行比较。结果:最终目标坐标的平均值±SD为侧面(X)为11.7±1.5 mm,后部(Y)为2.4±1.5 mm,并且在连合点中点(Z)以下为6.1±1.7 mm。在“间接” X,Z坐标与最终目标的坐标之间未发现显着差异。 “间接” Y坐标显着位于最终目标的Y后方,平均差为0.6 mm(p = 0.014)。在“直接” X,Y和Z坐标与最终目标的坐标之间没有发现显着差异。结论:功能性STN靶标紧邻其解剖中心。在术前靶向时,我们建议使用“直接”方法,并考虑最终靶与连合中点(MCP)和不同RN边界的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号