...
首页> 外文期刊>Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: Official Journal of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery >Evaluating Indirect Subthalamic Nucleus Targeting with Validated 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
【24h】

Evaluating Indirect Subthalamic Nucleus Targeting with Validated 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

机译:用经验证的3-Tesla磁共振成像评估丘脑底核的间接靶向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Objectives: Indirect targeting of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is commonly utilized at deep brain stimulation (DBS) centers around the world. The superiority of either midcommissural point (MCP)-based or red nucleus (RN)-based indirect targeting remains to be established. Methods: The location of the STN was determined and statistically compared to MCP-and RN-based predictions in 58 STN DBS patients, using a validated 3-tesla MRI protocol. The influence of additional neuroanatomical parameters on STN midpoint location was evaluated. Linear regression analysis was utilized to produce an optimized MCP/RN targeting model. Targeting coordinates at 1.5 T were compared to results at 3 T. Results: Accuracy and precision for RN-based targeting was superior to MCP-based targeting to predict STN midpoint location for each coordinate dimension (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). RN-based targeting was statistically equivalent to an optimized regression-based targeting strategy incorporating multiple neuroanatomical parameters, including third-ventricle width and overall brain size. RN-based targeting at 1.5 T yielded equivalent coordinates to targeting at 3 T. Conclusions: RN-based targeting is statistically superior to MCP-based STN targeting and accommodates broad variations in neuroanatomical parameters. Neurosurgeons utilizing indirect targeting of the STN may consider favoring RN-based over MCP-based indirect targeting methods. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景/目的:丘脑底核(STN)的间接​​靶向在世界各地的深层大脑刺激(DBS)中心普遍使用。基于连合中点(MCP)或基于红核(RN)的间接​​靶向的优越性仍有待确立。方法:使用经过验证的3-tesla MRI方案确定58例STN DBS患者中STN的位置,并将其与基于MCP和RN的预测进行统计比较。评估了其他神经解剖参数对STN中点位置的影响。利用线性回归分析来产生优化的MCP / RN靶向模型。将在1.5 T时的目标坐标与在3 T时的结果进行比较。结果:对于每个坐标维度,基于RN的目标的精确度和精确度优于基于MCP的目标的预测STN中点位置(分别为p <0.01和p <0.05) 。基于RN的靶向在统计上等同于结合了多个神经解剖参数(包括第三心室宽度和整体大脑大小)的基于优化回归的靶向策略。在1.5 T处基于RN的靶向产生与在3 T处靶向的等效坐标。结论:基于RN的靶向在统计学上优于基于MCP的STN靶向,并适应神经解剖参数的广泛变化。利用STN间接靶向的神经外科医生可以考虑偏爱基于RN而不是基于MCP的间接靶向方法。 (C)2014 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号