首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian journal of chemical engineering >Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows
【24h】

Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows

机译:湍流剪切流中湍流颗粒扩散模型的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This work compares the performance of two Lagrangian turbulent particle dispersion models: the standard model (e.g., that presented in Sommerfeld et al. (1993)), in which the fluctuating fluid velocity experienced by the particle is composed of two components, one correlated with the previous time step and a second one randomly sampled from a Wiener process, and the model proposed by Minier and Peirano (2001), which is based on the PDF approach and performs closure at the level of acceleration of the fluid experienced by the particle. Formulation of a Langevin equation model for the increments of fluid velocity seen by the particle allows capturing some underlying physics of particle dispersion in general turbulent flows while keeping the mathematical manipulation of the stochastic model simple, thereby avoiding some pitfalls and simplifying the derivation of macroscopic relations. The performance of both dispersion models is tested in the configurations of grid-generated turbulence (Wells and Stock (1983) experiments), simple shear flow (Hyland et al., 1999) and confined axisymmetric jet flow laden with solids (Hishida and Maeda (1987) experiments).
机译:这项工作比较了两个拉格朗日湍流颗粒弥散模型的性能:标准模型(例如,Sommerfeld等人(1993)提出的模型),其中颗粒经历的脉动流体速度由两个分量组成,一个与上一个时间步长和第二个时间步长是从Wiener过程中随机采样的,以及Minier和Peirano(2001)提出的模型,该模型基于PDF方法,并在粒子经历的流体加速水平上执行闭合。用Langevin方程模型为颗粒所看到的流体速度的增加进行描述,可以捕获一般湍流中颗粒分散的一些基本物理原理,同时保持对随机模型的数学操作简单,从而避免了一些陷阱并简化了宏观关系的推导。两种色散模型的性能都在网格产生的湍流(Wells and Stock(1983)实验),简单剪切流(Hyland等人,1999)和载有固体的受限轴对称射流(Hishida和Maeda( 1987)实验)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号