首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery >Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
【24h】

Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery

机译:两种心脏手术后患者自控麻醉方案的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Acute and severe pain is frequent in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) can be used to manage postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia of morphine PCA alone (without continous infusion) with morphine PCA plus a continuous infusion on postoperative period after cardiac surgery and to evaluate pain scores, morphine consumption, number of demand, patient satisfaction and side effects. METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted to assess patients who underwent cardiac surgery receiving either morphine PCA alone or morphine PCA plus continous infusion. In the post operative period, PCA was started at extubation in both regiments according to randomization. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, number of demand, satisfaction and side effects were assessed at zero, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty hours after patients' extubation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 100 patients. 50 patients received morphine PCA alone, (Group A) and 50 patients received morphine PCA plus a background infusion, (Group B). Group B patients had less demand, consumed more morphine and were more satisfied regarding analgesia. No statistical differences were shown between groups related to pain intensity, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain control was effective and similar in both groups. Morphine PCA alone seems to be better for postoperative pain manage in cardiac surgery, due to its less morphine expense with the same effectiveness.
机译:简介:进行心胸外科手术的患者经常出现剧烈而剧烈的疼痛。患者自控镇痛(PCA)可用于管理术后疼痛。目的:比较吗啡PCA单独镇痛(不连续输注)与吗啡PCA加心脏手术后持续输注的镇痛效果,以评估疼痛评分,吗啡消耗量,需求量,患者满意度和副作用。方法:进行了一项随机试验以评估接受心脏手术的患者,他们接受单独的吗啡PCA或吗啡PCA加连续输注。在术后,根据随机分组,两组均在拔管时开始PCA。在拔管后的零,六,十二,十八,二十四和三十小时评估疼痛强度,吗啡消耗量,需求量,满意度和副作用。结果:该研究招募了100名患者。 50例患者单独接受吗啡PCA(A组),50例患者接受吗啡PCA加上背景输液(B组)。 B组患者的需求较少,服用了更多的吗啡,并且对镇痛的满意度更高。两组之间在疼痛强度和副作用方面没有统计学差异。结论:两组疼痛控制均有效且相似。单独使用吗啡PCA似乎更有利于心脏手术中的术后疼痛控制,因为吗啡的花费较少且具有相同的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号