首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Development of a scale to evaluate medical professional identity formation
【24h】

Development of a scale to evaluate medical professional identity formation

机译:制定评估医疗专业人员身份形成的量表

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Medical educators now focus on professional identity formation (PIF), which is a process of psychological development and socialization in the community of practice. This study aimed to develop an instrument to evaluate PIF that can be applied to a large group of medical trainees. A self-administered questionnaire was created with items on priorities, behavior standards, attitudes, and emotional control of well-developed physicians, in addition to items on their background and experience in playing the role of a physician. The participants were divided into four respondent groups: 4th- and 6th-year medical students and 2nd-year residents at Kagoshima University, and experienced medical doctors (instructors). Using factor analysis of data from 318 respondents and respondent group comparison, a developing scale (DS) with 15 items was created. The DS has a five-factor structure and evaluates self-control as a professional (factor 1), awareness of being a medical doctor (factor 2), reflection as a medical doctor (factor 3), execution of social responsibility (factor 4), and external and internal self-harmonization (factor 5). The mean DS score of the instructors was significantly higher than that of the residents (p??0.01), the mean score of residents and instructors was significantly higher than that of students (p??0.01), and the mean score of instructors was significantly higher than that of all other respondents (p??0.01). Respondent group, but not gender, was a significant variable of the DS. The DS and scores of factors 2 and 4 correlated with 6th-year medical students’ experience in playing the role of a physician during clinical training, and scores of factors 3 and 4 correlated with 2nd-year residents’ experience in playing the role of a physician. There was no significant difference between the mean DS score of 4th- and 6th-year medical students, which might due to less clinical experience among 6th-year medical students or a limitation of the scale to evaluate pre-clinical medical students. The DS could be a useful indicator of medical trainees’ personal and professional development and socialization. Experience in playing the role of a physician might facilitate medical trainees’ PIF.
机译:医学教育者现在专注于专业身份形成(PIF),这是实践社区中心理发展和社会化的过程。这项研究旨在开发一种评估PIF的工具,该工具可以应用于一大批医学培训生。创建了一份自我管理的调查表,其中包括有关发达医师的优先事项,行为标准,态度和情绪控制的项目,此外还包括有关他们的背景和扮演医师角色的经验的项目。参与者分为四个受访者组:鹿儿岛大学4年级和6年级的医学生以及2年级的居民,以及经验丰富的医生(讲师)。使用来自318位受访者的数据的因子分析和受访者组比较,创建了一个包含15个项目的发展规模(DS)。 DS具有五因素结构,并以专业人员的自我控制(因素1),对医生的意识(因素2),对医生的反思(因素3),履行社会责任(因素4)进行评估。 ,以及内部和外部的自我协调(因子5)。指导老师的平均DS得分显着高于居民(p 0.01),居民和指导老师的平均得分显着高于学生(p 0.01),而学生的平均DS得分显着高于学生。讲师的人数显着高于所有其他受访者(p <0.01)。受访者群体而非性别是DS的重要变量。 DS和因子2和4的得分与6年级医学生在临床培训中扮演医生角色的经验相关,因子3和4的得分与2年级学生在医学界中扮演医生角色的经验相关。医师。 4年级和6年级医学生的平均DS得分之间没有显着差异,这可能是由于6年级医学生的临床经验较少或临床前医学生评估规模的限制。 DS可能是医学实习生个人和专业发展以及社会化的有用指标。扮演医生角色的经验可能会促进受训人员的PIF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号