首页> 外文期刊>BMC International Health and Human Rights >Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh
【24h】

Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh

机译:辅助技术的使用与人权的享受:孟加拉国的一项横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background About half a billion people with disabilities in developing countries have limited access to assistive technology. The Convention on the Rights of persons with Disabilities requires governments to take measures to ensure provision of such technologies. To guide implementation of these measures there is a need for understanding health outcomes from a human rights perspective. The objective of this study was therefore to explore the relation between assistive technology use and enjoyment of human rights in a low-income country. Methods Data was collected in eight districts of Bangladesh through interviews of people with hearing impairments using and not using hearings aids, and people with ambulatory impairments using and not using manual wheelchairs (N?=?583). Using logistic regression, self-reported outcomes on standard of living, health, education, work, receiving information and movement were analyzed. Results The adjusted likelihood of reporting greater enjoyment of human rights was significantly higher among people using hearing aids compared to non-users for all outcomes except working status. Compared to non-users, users of wheelchairs reported a significantly higher adjusted likelihood of good ambulatory performance and a significantly lower adjusted likelihood of reporting a positive working status. Further analyses indicated that physical accessibility to working places and duration of wheelchair use had a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of reporting positive work outcomes. Conclusions The findings support the notion that assistive technology use increases the likelihood of human rights enjoyment, particularly hearing aid use. Physical accessibility should always be addressed in wheelchair provision.
机译:背景技术发展中国家约有十亿残疾人获得辅助技术的机会有限。 《残疾人权利公约》要求各国政府采取措施以确保提供此类技术。为了指导这些措施的实施,需要从人权的角度了解健康结果。因此,本研究的目的是探讨低收入国家辅助技术的使用与人权享受之间的关系。方法访谈孟加拉国八个地区的数据,方法是采访使用或不使用助听器的听力障碍者和使用或不使用手动轮椅的行动障碍者(N == 583)。使用逻辑回归,对生活,健康,教育,工作,接受信息和运动水平的自我报告结果进行了分析。结果与非使用者相比,使用助听器的人除工作状态外,在所有结果方面,调整后的报告享有更大享受人权的可能性明显更高。与不使用轮椅的人相比,使用轮椅的人报告称其具有良好的门诊表现的调整后的可能性明显较高,而报告呈阳性工作状态的调整后的可能性则明显较低。进一步的分析表明,工作场所的身体可及性和轮椅使用时间对报告积极工作成果的可能性具有统计学上的显着影响。结论研究结果支持以下观点:辅助技术的使用会增加享受人权的可能性,尤其是助听器的使用。轮椅上应始终注意身体无障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号