...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
【24h】

The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis

机译:基于模拟的临床教育中物理治疗学生的专业能力工具的有效性:Rasch分析

获取原文

摘要

Background Despite the recent widespread adoption of simulation in clinical education in physiotherapy, there is a lack of validated tools for assessment in this setting. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a comprehensive tool used in clinical placement settings in Australia to measure professional competence of physiotherapy students. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of the APP for student assessment in simulation settings. Methods A total of 1260 APPs were collected, 971 from students in simulation and 289 from students in clinical placements. Rasch analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the APP tool in three different simulation assessment formats: longitudinal assessment over 1 week of simulation; longitudinal assessment over 2 weeks; and a short-form (25?min) assessment of a single simulation scenario. Comparison with APPs from 5 week clinical placements in hospital and clinic-based settings were also conducted. Results The APP demonstrated acceptable fit to the expectations of the Rasch model for the 1 and 2 week clinical simulations, exhibiting unidimensional properties that were able to distinguish different levels of student performance. For the short-form simulation, nine of the 20 items recorded greater than 25?% of scores as ‘not-assessed’ by clinical educators which impacted on the suitability of the APP tool in this simulation format. Conclusion The APP was a valid assessment tool when used in longitudinal simulation formats. A revised APP may be required for assessment in short-form simulation scenarios.
机译:背景技术尽管最近在物理疗法的临床教育中广泛采用了模拟方法,但在这种情况下仍缺乏经过验证的评估工具。物理治疗实践评估(APP)是一种综合工具,用于澳大利亚的临床实习场所,以评估物理治疗学生的专业能力。这项研究的目的是评估模拟环境中APP在学生评估中的有效性。方法收集了1260个APP,模拟学生971个,临床实习学生289个。使用Rasch分析以三种不同的模拟评估格式检查APP工具的构造有效性:模拟1周的纵向评估;以及2周的纵向评估;以及对单个模拟场景的简短评估(25分钟)。还与来自医院和基于诊所的环境中5周临床安置的APP进行了比较。结果APP在1周和2周的临床模拟中证明符合Rasch模型的期望,并且具有能够区分学生不同水平表现的一维特性。对于简短模拟,20个项目中有9个被临床教育者“未评估”的得分超过25%,这影响了该模拟格式的APP工具的适用性。结论当用于纵向仿真格式时,APP是一种有效的评估工具。在简短的模拟方案中评估可能需要修改的APP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号