...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The professionalism disconnect: do entering residents identify yet participate in unprofessional behaviors?
【24h】

The professionalism disconnect: do entering residents identify yet participate in unprofessional behaviors?

机译:专业精神脱节:进入居民区是否能够识别但仍参与非职业行为?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Professionalism has been an important tenet of medical education, yet defining it is a challenge. Perceptions of professional behavior may vary by individual, medical specialty, demographic group and institution. Understanding these differences should help institutions better clarify professionalism expectations and provide standards with which to evaluate resident behavior. Methods Duke University Hospital and Vidant Medical Center/East Carolina University surveyed entering PGY1 residents. Residents were queried on two issues: their perception of the professionalism of 46 specific behaviors related to training and patient care; and their own participation in those specified behaviors. The study reports data analyses for gender and institution based upon survey results in 2009 and 2010. The study received approval by the Institutional Review Boards of both institutions. Results 76% (375) of 495 PGY1 residents surveyed in 2009 and 2010 responded. A majority of responders rated all 46 specified behaviors as unprofessional, and a majority had either observed or participated in each behavior. For all 46 behaviors, a greater percentage of women rated the behaviors as unprofessional. Men were more likely than women to have participated in behaviors. There were several significant differences in both the perceptions of specified behaviors and in self-reported observation of and/or involvement in those behaviors between institutions. Respondents indicated the most important professionalism issues relevant to medical practice include: respect for colleagues/patients, relationships with pharmaceutical companies, balancing home/work life, and admitting mistakes. They reported that professionalism can best be assessed by peers, patients, observation of non-medical work and timeliness/detail of paperwork. Conclusion Defining professionalism in measurable terms is a challenge yet critical in order for it to be taught and assessed. Recognition of the differences by gender and institution should allow for tailored teaching and assessment of professionalism so that it is most meaningful. A shared understanding of what constitutes professional behavior is an important first step.
机译:背景专业精神一直是医学教育的重要宗旨,但要定义它却是一个挑战。对专业行为的看法可能因个人,医学专业,人口群体和机构而异。了解这些差异应有助于机构更好地阐明职业期望,并提供评估居民行为的标准。方法对杜克大学医院和维达医疗中心/东卡罗来纳大学进行了调查,以调查进入PGY1的居民。向居民提出了两个问题的询问:他们对与培训和患者护理有关的46种特定行为的专业性的看法;以及他们自己参与那些特定的行为。该研究报告基于2009年和2010年的调查结果对性别和机构进行了数据分析。该研究获得了两个机构的机构审查委员会的批准。结果2009年和2010年接受调查的495名PGY1居民中有76%(375)做出了回应。大多数回答者将所有46种指定行为评定为不专业,并且大多数观察到或参与了每种行为。在所有46种行为中,有更大比例的女性将这些行为评为不专业。男性比女性更有可能参与行为。机构之间对特定行为的看法以及对这些行为的自我报告观察和/或参与均存在若干重大差异。受访者指出,与医学实践有关的最重要的专业问题包括:尊重同事/患者,与制药公司的关系,平衡家庭/工作生活以及承认错误。他们报告说,最好由同行,患者,对非医学工作的观察以及文书的及时性/细节来评估专业水平。结论以可衡量的方式定义职业素养是一项挑战,但至关重要的是要对其进行教授和评估。对性别和机构差异的认识应允许进行有针对性的教学和职业素养评估,从而使其最有意义。对构成职业行为的共识是重要的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号