首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Use of electronic health record data to identify skin and soft tissue infections in primary care settings: a validation study
【24h】

Use of electronic health record data to identify skin and soft tissue infections in primary care settings: a validation study

机译:使用电子健康记录数据来识别初级保健机构中的皮肤和软组织感染:一项验证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Epidemiologic studies of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) depend upon accurate case identification. Our objective was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of electronic medical record data for identification of SSTIs in a primary care setting. Methods A validation study was conducted among primary care outpatients in an academic healthcare system. Encounters during four non-consecutive months in 2010 were included if any of the following were present in the electronic health record: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for an SSTI, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for incision and drainage, or a positive wound culture. Detailed chart review was performed to establish presence and type of SSTI. PPVs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated among all encounters, initial encounters, and cellulitis/abscess cases. Results Of the 731 encounters included, 514 (70.3%) were initial encounters and 448 (61.3%) were cellulitis/abscess cases. When the presence of an ICD-9 code, CPT code, or positive culture was used to identify SSTIs, 617 encounters were true positives, yielding a PPV of 84.4% [95% CI: 81.8–87.0%]. The PPV for using ICD-9 codes alone to identify SSTIs was 90.7% [95 % CI: 88.5–92.9%]. For encounters with cellulitis/abscess codes, the PPV was 91.5% [95% CI: 88.9–94.1%]. Conclusions ICD-9 codes may be used to retrospectively identify SSTIs with a high PPV. Broadening SSTI case identification with microbiology data and CPT codes attenuates the PPV. Further work is needed to estimate the sensitivity of this method.
机译:背景技术皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)的流行病学研究取决于准确的病例识别。我们的目标是评估电子病历数据的阳性预测值(PPV),以在基层医疗机构中识别SSTI。方法在学术医疗保健系统中的初级保健门诊患者中进行验证研究。如果电子健康记录中包含以下任何内容,则包括2010年连续四个月的遭遇:国际疾病分类,SSTI的第九修订版(ICD-9)代码,切口的当前程序术语(CPT)代码和引流,或伤口培养阳性。进行了详细的图表审查,以确定SSTI的存在和类型。在所有遭遇,初次遭遇和蜂窝组织炎/脓肿病例之间计算了PPV和95%置信区间(CI)。结果在731次接触中,初次接触为514次(70.3%),蜂窝织炎/脓肿病例为448次(61.3%)。当使用ICD-9码,CPT码或阳性培养物鉴定SSTI时,遇到617次为真阳性,PPV为84.4%[95%CI:81.8-87.0%]。仅使用ICD-9代码识别SSTI的PPV为90.7%[95%CI:88.5-92.9%]。遇到蜂窝织炎/脓肿代码时,PPV为91.5%[95%CI:88.9–94.1%]。结论ICD-9代码可用于回顾性鉴定高PPV的SSTI。利用微生物学数据和CPT代码扩大SSTI病例识别范围会降低PPV。需要进一步的工作来估计这种方法的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号