...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Pattern and determinants of HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: bibliometric analysis of 1981 to 2009 PubMed papers
【24h】

Pattern and determinants of HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: bibliometric analysis of 1981 to 2009 PubMed papers

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲地区HIV研究生产力的模式和决定因素:1981年至2009年的文献计量分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Several bibliometric studies have been published on AIDS. The findings obtained from these studies have provided a general picture of the history and growth of AIDS literature. However, factors related to variation in HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa have not been examined. Therefore, this study aims to fill some of the gap in existing research to provide insights into factors associated with HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods A bibliometric analysis regarding sub-Saharan Africa HIV/AIDS research was conducted in the PubMed database for the period of 1981 to 2009. The numbers of HIV research articles indexed in PubMed was used as surrogate for total HIV research productivity. Series of univariable and multivariable negative binomial regression models were used to explore factors associated with variation in HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Results First authors from South Africa, Uganda and Kenya contributed almost half of the total number of HIV articles indexed in PubMed between 1981 and 2009. Uganda, Zimbabwe and Malawi had better records when the total production was adjusted for gross domestic product (GDP). Comoros, the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau were the most productive countries when the total products were normalized by number of people with HIV. There were strong positive and statistically significant correlation between countries number of indexed journal (Pearson correlation r = 0.77, p = .001), number of higher institutions (r = 0.60, p = .001), number of physicians (r = 0.83, p = .001) and absolute numbers of HIV articles. Conclusions HIV research productivity in Africa is highly skewed. To increase HIV research output, total expenditure on health (% of GDP), private expenditure on health, and adult literacy rate may be important factors to address.
机译:背景技术关于艾滋病的一些文献计量学研究已经发表。从这些研究中获得的发现提供了有关艾滋病文献的历史和发展的总体情况。但是,尚未检查与撒哈拉以南非洲地区HIV研究生产率差异相关的因素。因此,本研究旨在填补现有研究中的一些空白,以洞察与撒哈拉以南非洲与HIV研究生产力相关的因素。方法在1981年至2009年期间,在PubMed数据库中对撒哈拉以南非洲地区HIV / AIDS研究进行了文献计量分析。使用PubMed中索引的HIV研究文章数量代替了总的HIV研究生产力。一系列单变量和多变量负二项式回归模型用于探索与撒哈拉以南非洲地区HIV研究生产力变化相关的因素。结果在1981年至2009年期间,来自南非,乌干达和肯尼亚的第一作者贡献了在PubMed中索引的HIV文章总数的几乎一半。按总国内生产总值(GDP)进行调整后,乌干达,津巴布韦和马拉维的记录更好。当按艾滋病毒感染者的人数归一化总产品时,科摩罗,冈比亚和几内亚比绍是生产力最高的国家。索引期刊的国家/地区数量与国家之间存在强烈的正向和统计学显着相关性(Pearson相关性r = 0.77,p = .001),高等院校的数量(r = 0.60,p = .001),医师数量(r = 0.83, p = .001)和HIV物品的绝对数量。结论非洲的艾滋病毒研究生产率严重偏高。为了增加艾滋病毒的研究产出,卫生总支出(占GDP的百分比),私人卫生支出和成人识字率可能是需要解决的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号