首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Does PBL deliver constructive collaboration for students in interprofessional tutorial groups?
【24h】

Does PBL deliver constructive collaboration for students in interprofessional tutorial groups?

机译:PBL是否为跨专业辅导小组的学生提供建设性合作?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Training health professional students in teamwork is recognized as an important step to create interprofessional collaboration in the clinical workplace. Interprofessional problem-based learning (PBL) is one learning approach that has been proposed to provide students with the opportunity to develop the necessary skills to work collaboratively with various health professionals. This study aimed to explore the extent to which students in interprofessional tutorial groups demonstrate constructive collaboration during group discussions. Students (N?=?52) from the Medical, Midwifery and Nursing programmes took part in the study. Video-recordings were made of interprofessional PBL discussions (N?=?40) in five groups, eight videos per group. Over a period of 4 weeks, participants discussed four scenarios concerned with the reproductive system. The resulting 67?h of video data were analysed qualitatively. To ensure inter-rater reliability, two tutors assessed the students’ constructive, collaborative activities using the Maastricht Peer-Activity Rating Scale (MPARS). Finally, to gain an understanding of students’ perceptions of their performance and participation in the interprofessional PBL tutorial, we organized three uni-professional focus groups (FGs) at the end of pilot project. The translated MPARS was reliable (Kappa coefficient 0.01–0.20 and p??0.05). Students were actively involved in the discussion and contributed to a better understanding regardless of their professional background. Group members from different professions complemented one another in solving learning issues. They were open, feeling free to question and argue from the viewpoint of their own profession, and also understood their strengths and limitations. The statistical test of the scores for constructive and collaborative activities indicated a significant difference between students and the various healthcare professionals, p?=?0.000, with medical students scoring highest on both activities. Focus groups further clarified some of the observed dynamics. Implementing interprofessional PBL could motivate students to engage collaboratively in co-constructing knowledge to solve the patients’ problem. Medical students scored highest on constructive and collaborative activities.
机译:培训卫生专业学生的团队合作被认为是在临床工作场所建立跨专业合作的重要步骤。专业间的基于问题的学习(PBL)是已提出的一种学习方法,旨在为学生提供发展必要技能以与各种卫生专业人员合作的机会。这项研究旨在探讨跨专业辅导小组中的学生在小组讨论中表现出建设性合作的程度。来自医学,助产士和护理专业的学生(N?=?52)参加了这项研究。录像由五个小组的专业间PBL讨论(N?=?40)组成,每组八个录像。在为期4周的时间内,参与者讨论了与生殖系统有关的四种情况。定性分析了所得的67小时视频数据。为了确保评估者之间的可靠性,两名导师使用马斯特里赫特同伴活动评估量表(MPARS)评估了学生的建设性合作活动。最后,为了了解学生对他们的表现和参加跨专业PBL教程的了解,我们在试点项目结束时组织了三个单专业焦点小组(FG)。翻译的MPARS是可靠的(Kappa系数为0.01–0.20,p?<?0.05)。无论他们的专业背景如何,学生都积极参与讨论并为更好的理解做出了贡献。来自不同行业的小组成员在解决学习问题上相互补充。他们很开放,可以从自己的专业角度进行提问和辩论,也可以理解自己的优势和局限性。对建设性和合作性活动得分的统计检验表明,学生与各种医疗保健专业人员之间存在显着差异,p?=?0.000,其中医学生在两项活动中得分最高。专题小组进一步澄清了一些观察到的动态。实施跨专业的PBL可以激发学生合作参与共同构建知识以解决患者的问题。医学生在建设性和合作性活动中得分最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号