...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC International Health and Human Rights >Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
【24h】

Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation

机译:解释由妇女团体领导的社区动员干预对孕产妇和新生儿健康结局的影响:Ekjut试验过程评估

获取原文

摘要

Background Few large and rigorous evaluations of participatory interventions systematically describe their context and implementation, or attempt to explain the mechanisms behind their impact. This study reports process evaluation data from the Ekjut cluster-randomised controlled trial of a participatory learning and action cycle with women's groups to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes in Jharkhand and Orissa, eastern India (2005-2008). The study demonstrated a 45% reduction in neonatal mortality in the last two years of the intervention, largely driven by improvements in safe practices for home deliveries. Methods A participatory learning and action cycle with 244 women's groups was implemented in 18 intervention clusters covering an estimated population of 114 141. We describe the context, content, and implementation of this intervention, identify potential mechanisms behind its impact, and report challenges experienced in the field. Methods included a review of intervention documents, qualitative structured discussions with group members and non-group members, meeting observations, as well as descriptive statistical analysis of data on meeting attendance, activities, and characteristics of group attendees. Results Six broad, interrelated factors influenced the intervention's impact: (1) acceptability; (2) a participatory approach to the development of knowledge, skills and 'critical consciousness'; (3) community involvement beyond the groups; (4) a focus on marginalized communities; (5) the active recruitment of newly pregnant women into groups; (6) high population coverage. We hypothesize that these factors were responsible for the increase in safe delivery and care practices that led to the reduction in neonatal mortality demonstrated in the Ekjut trial. Conclusions Participatory interventions with community groups can influence maternal and child health outcomes if key intervention characteristics are preserved and tailored to local contexts. Scaling-up such interventions requires (1) a detailed understanding of the way in which context affects the acceptability and delivery of the intervention; (2) planned but flexible replication of key content and implementation features; (3) strong support for participatory methods from implementing agencies.
机译:背景很少有人对参与式干预进行大型而严格的评估,可以系统地描述其背景和实施情况,或者试图解释其影响背后的机制。这项研究报告了来自印度东部的贾坎德邦和奥里萨邦(2005-2008年)与妇女团体进行的参与式学习和行动周期的Ekjut整群随机对照试验的过程评估数据。该研究表明,在干预的后两年中,新生儿死亡率降低了45%,这在很大程度上是由于改进了家庭分娩的安全做法所致。方法在18个干预小组中实施了244个妇女团体的参与式学习和行动周期,覆盖估计的114141人口。我们描述了该干预的背景,内容和实施,确定了其影响背后的潜在机制,并报告了在干预中遇到的挑战场。方法包括审查干预文件,与小组成员和非小组成员进行定性的结构化讨论,会议观察以及对会议出席,活动和小组参与者特征的数据进行描述性统计分析。结果六个广泛的,相互关联的因素影响了干预措施的影响:(1)可接受性; (2)以参与方式发展知识,技能和“批判意识”; (3)超越群体的社区参与; (4)关注边缘化社区; (五)积极招募新生孕妇。 (6)人口覆盖率高。我们假设这些因素是导致安全分娩和护理实践增加的原因,从而导致Ekjut试验证明新生儿死亡率降低。结论如果保留并根据当地情况定制关键的干预特征,则社区团体的参与式干预可以影响母婴健康结局。扩大此类干预措施需要(1)对背景影响干预措施的可接受性和交付方式的详细了解; (2)有计划但灵活地复制关键内容和实施功能; (3)执行机构大力支持参与式方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号