...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
【24h】

Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis

机译:各种护理模式下未剖腹产的比率差异:分解分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To evaluate the extent of the difference in elective (ELCS) and emergency (EMCS) caesarean section (CS) rates between nulliparous women in public maternity hospitals in Ireland by model of care, and to quantify the contribution of maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics in explaining the difference in the rates. Methods Cross-sectional analysis using a combination of two routinely collected administrative databases was performed. A non-linear extension of the Oaxaca-Blinder method is used to decompose the difference between public and private ELCS and EMCS rates into the proportion explained by the differences in observable maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics and the proportion that remains unexplained. Results Of the 29,870 babies delivered to nulliparous women, 7,792 were delivered via CS (26.1?%), 79.6?% of which were coded as EMCS. Higher prevalence of ELCS was associated with breech presentation, other malpresentation, and the mother being over 40?years old. Higher prevalence of EMCS was associated with placenta praevia or placental abruption, diabetes (pre-existing and gestational), and being over 40?years old. The private model of care is associated with ELCS and EMCS rates 6 percentage points higher compared than the public model of care but this differential is insignificant in the fully adjusted models for EMCS. Just over half (53?%) of the 6 percentage point difference in ELCS rates between the two models of care can be accounted for by maternal, clinical and hospital characteristics. Almost 80?% of the difference for EMCS can be accounted for. Conclusions The majority of the difference in EMCS rates across models of care can be explained by differing characteristics between the two groups of women. The main contributor to the difference was advancing maternal age. The unexplained component of the difference for ELCS is larger; an excess private effect remains after accounting for maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics. This requires further investigation and may be mitigated in future with the introduction of clinical guidelines related to CS.
机译:背景:通过护理模型评估爱尔兰公立妇产医院未产妇在选择性剖宫产(ELCS)和急诊(EMCS)剖宫产(CS)率上的差异程度,并量化产妇,临床和医院的贡献解释费率差异的特征。方法采用两个常规收集的管理数据库的组合进行横断面分析。 Oaxaca-Blinder方法的非线性扩展用于将公共和私人ELCS和EMCS费率之间的差异分解成比例,该比例由可观察到的孕产妇,临床和医院特征的差异以及无法解释的比例来解释。结果在分娩给未生育妇女的29,870例婴儿中,有7,792例通过CS进行了分娩(占26.1%),其中79.6%被编码为EMCS。 ELCS的较高患病率与臀位表现,其他畸形表现以及母亲40岁以上有关。 EMCS的较高患病率与胎盘早老或胎盘早剥,糖尿病(既存和妊娠)以及40岁以上有关。与公共护理模式相比,私人护理模式与ELCS和EMCS的比率高出6个百分点,但是这种差异在完全调整的EMCS模型中微不足道。两种护理模式之间ELCS发生率差异6个百分点的一半(53%)可以由孕产妇,临床和医院的特征来解释。几乎可以解决EMCS差异的80%。结论两种护理模式之间EMCS发生率的大部分差异可以通过两组女性之间的不同特征来解释。造成这种差异的主要原因是孕妇年龄的增长。 ELCS差异的无法解释的成分较大;在考虑了产妇,临床和医院的特征后,仍会产生过多的私人影响。这需要进一步的调查,将来可能会通过引入与CS相关的临床指南而得到缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号