...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The policy-practice gap: describing discordances between regulation on paper and real-life practices among specialized drug shops in Kenya
【24h】

The policy-practice gap: describing discordances between regulation on paper and real-life practices among specialized drug shops in Kenya

机译:政策与实践之间的差距:描述肯尼亚专门药店之间的纸张法规与现实生活实践之间的不一致

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Specialized drug shops (SDSs) are popular in Sub-Saharan Africa because they provide convenient access to medicines. There is increasing interest in how policymakers can work with them, but little knowledge on how their operation relates to regulatory frameworks. This study sought to describe characteristics and predictors of regulatory practices among SDSs in Kenya. Methods The regulatory framework governing the Kenya pharmaceutical sector was mapped, and a list of regulations selected for inclusion in a survey questionnaire. An SDS census was conducted, and survey data collected from 213 SDSs from two districts in Western Kenya. Results The majority of SDSs did not comply with regulations, with only 12% having a refrigerator and 22% having a separate dispensing area for instance. Additionally, less than half had at least one staff with pharmacy qualification (46%), with less than a third of all interviewed operators knowing the name of the law governing pharmacy. Regulatory infringement was more common among SDSs in rural locations; those that did not have staff with pharmacy qualifications; and those whose operator did not know the name of the pharmacy law. Compliance was not significantly associated with the frequency of inspections, with over 80% of both rural and urban SDSs reporting an inspection in the past year. Conclusion While compliance was low overall, it was particularly poor among SDSs operating in rural locations, and those that did not have staff with pharmacy qualification. This suggested the need for policy to introduce levels of practice in recognition of the variations in resource availability. Under such a system, rural SDSs operating in low-resource setting, and selling a limited range of medicines, may be exempted from certain regulatory requirements, as long as their scope of practice is limited to certain essential services only. Future research should also explore why regulatory compliance is poor despite regular inspections.
机译:背景技术专门的药店(SDS)在撒哈拉以南非洲很受欢迎,因为它们提供了便捷的药品获取渠道。对决策者如何与他们合作的兴趣日益浓厚,但对他们的运作与监管框架之间的关系知之甚少。这项研究试图描述肯尼亚SDS中监管实践的特征和预测因素。方法绘制了管理肯尼亚制药业的法规框架,并选择了要纳入调查问卷的法规清单。进行了一次SDS普查,并从肯尼亚西部两个地区的213个SDS中收集了调查数据。结果大多数SDS不符合法规,例如,只有12%的冰箱和22%的冰箱有单独的分配区域。此外,不到一半的人至少拥有一名具有药房资格的员工(46%),在所有接受采访的运营商中,只有不到三分之一的人知道药品法的名称。在农村地区的安全数据单中,违反法规的情况比较普遍。没有药学资格人员的人员;以及那些操作者不知道药房法名称的人。遵守情况与检查频率没有显着相关,在过去一年中,超过80%的农村和城市SDS都报告了检查情况。结论虽然总体合规性较低,但在农村地区运营的SDS和那些没有药师资格的SDS中尤为糟糕。这表明需要制定政策来引入实践水平,以认识到资源可用性的变化。在这种制度下,只要资源范围仅限于某些基本服务,则在资源匮乏的情况下经营农村SDS并销售有限范围的药品可以免除某些监管要求。未来的研究还应该探讨,尽管进行了定期检查,但为何合规性仍然很差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号