...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration of general practitioners and community pharmacists - a qualitative study
【24h】

Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration of general practitioners and community pharmacists - a qualitative study

机译:全科医生和社区药剂师跨专业合作的看法-定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite numerous evidences for the positive effect of community pharmacists on health care, interprofessional collaboration of pharmacists and general practitioners is very often limited. Though highly trained, pharmacists remain an underutilised resource in primary health care in most western countries. This qualitative study aims at investigating pharmacists’ and general practitioners’ views on barriers to interprofessional collaboration in the German health care system. Methods A total of 13 narrative in-depth interviews, and two focus group discussions with 12 pharmacists and general practitioners in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, a predominantly rural region of North-Eastern Germany, were conducted. The interviews aimed at exploring general practitioners’ and pharmacists’ attitudes, views and experiences of interprofessional collaboration. At a second stage, two focus group discussions were performed. Fieldwork was carried out by a multi-professional team. All interviews and focus group discussions were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. The constant comparative method of analysis from grounded theory was applied to the data. Results There are three main findings: First, mutual trust and appreciation appear to be important factors influencing the quality of interprofessional collaboration. Second, in light of negative personal experiences, pharmacists call for a predefined, clear and straightforward way to communicate with physicians. Third, given the increasing challenge to treat a rising number of elderly patients with chronic conditions, general practitioners desire competent support of experienced pharmacists. Conclusions On the ground of methodological triangulation the findings of this study go beyond previous investigations and are able to provide specific recommendations for future interprofessional collaboration. First, interventions and initiatives should focus on increasing trust, e.g. by implementing multi-professional local quality circles. Second, governments and health authorities in most countries have been and still are reluctant in advancing political initiatives that bring together physicians and pharmacists. Proactive lobbying and empowerment of pharmacists are extremely important in this context. In addition, future physician and pharmaceutical training curricula should focus on comprehensive pharmacist-physician interaction at early stages within both professional educations and careers. Developing and fostering a culture of continued professional exchange and appreciation is one major challenge of future policy and research.
机译:背景技术尽管有许多证据表明社区药剂师对卫生保健具有积极作用,但药剂师和全科医生的专业间合作经常受到限制。尽管训练有素,但在大多数西方国家,药剂师在初级卫生保健中仍未得到充分利用。这项定性研究旨在调查药剂师和全科医生对德国医疗体系中跨专业合作障碍的看法。方法在德国东北部的一个主要农村地区,梅克伦堡-前波莫瑞州,共进行了13次叙述性深度访谈,并与12名药剂师和全科医生进行了两次焦点小组讨论。访谈旨在探讨全科医生和药剂师在跨专业合作方面的态度,观点和经验。在第二阶段,进行了两次焦点小组讨论。实地调查由一个多专业团队进行。所有访谈和焦点小组讨论均进行录音和逐字记录。将基于扎根理论的恒定比较分析方法应用于数据。结果有三个主要发现:第一,相互信任和赞赏似乎是影响跨专业合作质量的重要因素。其次,鉴于负面的个人经历,药剂师呼吁采用一种预先定义的,清晰而直接的方式与医生进行沟通。第三,鉴于治疗越来越多的患有慢性病的老年患者的挑战日益增加,全科医生希望经验丰富的药剂师给予有力的支持。结论基于方法三角剖分法,本研究的结果超出了先前的研究范围,并能够为未来的跨专业合作提供具体建议。首先,干预和倡议应着重于增加信任,例如通过实施多专业的本地质量圈。第二,大多数国家的政府和卫生当局一直并且仍然不愿意推进将医师和药剂师召集在一起的政治倡议。在这种情况下,积极游说和授权药剂师是非常重要的。此外,未来的医师和药物培训课程应该在职业教育和职业生涯的早期阶段集中于药剂师与医师的全面互动。发展和培养持续的专业交流和赞赏的文化是未来政策和研究的主要挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号