...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
【24h】

Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital

机译:手术室外的抗菌药物预防,一家大学医院的审核

获取原文

摘要

Background The prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents to prevent infections in non-surgical situations has hardly been investigated. We investigate the extent, indications and appropriateness of antimicrobial prophylaxis given outside the operating room in a tertiary care hospital. Methods Four point-prevalence surveys were conducted in which all inpatients on that day were screened for the use of prophylactic antimicrobials: medical prophylaxis, prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward. The primary endpoint was the extent of prophylaxis relative to the total number of antimicrobial prescriptions. We also investigated per prescription the presence of a (local) protocol and adherence to these protocols. Results We registered in total 1020 antimicrobial prescriptions, of which 317 (31.1%) were given as prophylaxis. 827/1020 were antibiotic prescriptions. Of these antibiotic prescriptions, 17.0% was medical prophylaxis, 2.7% prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and 6.9% surgical prophylaxis administered on a ward. For medical antibiotic prophylaxis, a protocol was present in 125 of 141 prescriptions (88.7%); the protocol was followed in 118 cases (94.4%). For prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis on the wards, protocol presence and adherence rates were 59.1% and 92.3%, and 73.3% and 97.6% respectively. Of the 96 antiviral and 97 antifungal prescriptions, 42.7% and 57.8%, respectively, were medical prophylaxis, of which 95.1 and 96.3% were prescribed according to protocols respectively. Conclusions Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre is responsible for a considerable part of total in-hospital antimicrobial use. For most prescriptions there was a protocol and adherence to the protocols was high. The main targets for improvement were prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward.
机译:背景技术几乎没有研究过在非手术情况下预防性使用抗菌剂预防感染的研究。我们调查了三级医院手术室外给予的抗菌药物预防的程度,适应症和适当性。方法进行了四点流行度调查,对当天的所有住院患者进行了预防性抗菌药物的使用筛查:医疗预防,非手术干预的预防和病房进行的手术预防。主要终点是相对于抗菌药物处方总数的预防程度。我们还按处方调查了(本地)协议的存在和对这些协议的遵守情况。结果我们共注册了1020份抗菌处方,其中317份(31.1%)被用作预防药物。 827/1020是抗生素处方。在这些抗生素处方中,有17.0%为药物预防,非手术干预为2.7%,病房为6.9%。对于医学上的抗生素预防,在141个处方中有125个处方存在方案(88.7%);在所有处方中,有一个方案存在。 118例(94.4%)遵循了该协议。对于非手术干预的预防和病房的手术预防,方案的出现率和依从率分别为59.1%和92.3%,73.3%和97.6%。在96份抗病毒处方和97份抗真菌处方中,分别有42.7%和57.8%的药物是预防性药物,其中分别有95.1%和96.3%的药物根据处方进行了预防。结论手术室外的抗菌药物预防是整个院内抗菌药物使用的很大一部分。对于大多数处方而言,都有协议,并且对协议的遵守率很高。改善的主要目标是预防非手术干预和病房进行手术预防。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号