首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Methods for dealing with discrepant records in linked population health datasets: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Methods for dealing with discrepant records in linked population health datasets: a cross-sectional study

机译:链接的人口健康数据集中处理差异记录的方法:一项横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Linked population health data are increasingly used in epidemiological studies. If data items are reported on more than one dataset, data linkage can reduce the under-ascertainment associated with many population health datasets. However, this raises the possibility of discrepant case reports from different datasets. Methods We examined the effect of four methods of classifying discrepant reports from different population health datasets on the estimated prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and on the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for known risk factors. Data were obtained from linked, validated, birth and hospital data for women who gave birth in a New South Wales hospital (Australia) 2000–2002. Results Among 250173 women with linked data, 238412 (95.3%) women had perfect agreement on the occurrence of hypertension, 1577 (0.6%) had imperfect agreement; 9369 (3.7%) had hypertension reported in only one dataset (under-reporting) and 815 (0.3%) had conflicting types of hypertension. Using only perfect agreement between birth and discharge data resulted in the lowest prevalence rates (0.3% chronic, 5.1% pregnancy hypertension), while including all reports resulted in the highest prevalence rates (1.1 % chronic, 8.7% pregnancy hypertension). The higher prevalence rates were generally consistent with international reports. In contrast, perfect agreement gave the highest aOR (95% confidence interval) for known risk factors: risk of chronic hypertension for maternal age ≥40 years was 4.0 (2.9, 5.3) and the risk of pregnancy hypertension for multiple birth was 2.8 (2.5, 3.2). Conclusion The method chosen for classifying discrepant case reports should vary depending on the study question; all reports should be used as part of calculating the range of prevalence estimates, but perfect matches may be best suited to risk factor analyses. These findings are likely to be applicable to the linkage of any specialised health services datasets to population data that include information on diagnoses or procedures.
机译:背景技术流行病学研究越来越多地使用关联的人群健康数据。如果在多个数据集中报告了数据项,则数据链接可以减少与许多人口健康数据集相关的不确定性。但是,这增加了来自不同数据集的病例报告不一致的可能性。方法我们研究了对来自不同人群健康数据集的差异报告进行分类的四种方法对估计的妊娠高血压疾病患病率以及已知危险因素的校正比值比(aOR)的影响。数据来自于2000–2002年在新南威尔士州医院(澳大利亚)分娩的妇女的链接,经过验证的出生和医院数据。结果在具有关联数据的250173名妇女中,有238412名(95.3%)妇女对高血压的发生有完全的共识,有1577名(0.6%)对高血压的发生有不完全的了解;仅在一个数据集中(未报告)报告了9369(3.7%)高血压,而有高血压类型冲突的有815(0.3%)。仅使用出生和出院数据之间的完美一致性,患病率最低(慢性病为0.3%,妊娠高血压为5.1%),而包括所有报告在内,患病率最高(慢性病为1.1%,妊娠高血压为8​​.7%)。较高的患病率通常与国际报告一致。相反,对于已知的危险因素,完美的协议给出了最高的aOR(95%置信区间):孕妇≥40岁的慢性高血压的风险为4.0(2.9,5.3),多胎妊娠的高血压的风险为2.8(2.5 ,3.2)。结论根据不同的研究问题,选择差异病例报告的方法应有所不同。所有报告都应用作计算患病率估计值范围的一部分,但完美匹配可能最适合于风险因素分析。这些发现可能适用于任何专业卫生服务数据集与人口数据的链接,其中包括有关诊断或程序的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号