首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Primary care clinical practice guidelines in South Africa: qualitative study exploring perspectives of national stakeholders
【24h】

Primary care clinical practice guidelines in South Africa: qualitative study exploring perspectives of national stakeholders

机译:南非的初级保健临床实践指南:定性研究,探索国家利益相关者的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are common tools in policy and clinical practice informing clinical decisions at the bedside, governance of health facilities, health insurer and government spending, and patient choices. South Africa’s health sector is transitioning to a national health insurance system, aiming to build on other primary health care initiatives to transform the previously segregated, inequitable services. Within these plans CPGs are an integral tool for delivering standardised and cost effective care. Currently, there is no accepted standard approach to developing, adapting or implementing CPGs efficiently or effectively in South Africa. We explored the current players; drivers; and the context and processes of primary care CPG development from the perspective of stakeholders operating at national level. Methods We used a qualitative approach. Sampling was initially purposeful, followed by snowballing and further sampling to reach representivity of primary care service providers. Individual in-depth interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used thematic content analysis to analyse the data. Results We conducted 37 in-depth interviews from June 2014–July 2015. We found CPG development and implementation were hampered by lack of human and funding resources for technical and methodological work; fragmentation between groups, and between national and provincial health sectors; and lack of agreed systems for CPG development and implementation. Some CPG contributors steadfastly work to improve processes aiming to enhance communication, use of evidence, and transparency to ensure credible guidance is produced. Many interviewed had shared values, and were driven to address inequity, however, resource gaps were perceived to create an enabling environment for commercial interests or personal agendas to drive the CPG development process. Conclusions Our findings identified strengths and gaps in CPG development processes, and a need for national standards to guide CPG development and implementation. Based on our findings and suggestions from participants, a possible way forward would be for South Africa to have a centrally coordinated CPG unit to address these needs and aspects of fragmentation by devising processes that support collaboration, transparency and credibility across sectors and disciplines. Such an initiative will require adequate resourcing to build capacity and ensure support for the delivery of high quality CPGs for South African primary care.
机译:背景技术临床实践指南(CPG)是政策和临床实践中常用的工具,可在床边告知临床决策,医疗机构的治理,健康保险公司和政府的支出以及患者的选择。南非的卫生部门正在向国家健康保险体系过渡,其目的是在其他基础医疗保健计划的基础上,改变以前隔离的,不平等的服务。在这些计划中,CPG是提供标准化且具有成本效益的护理的必要工具。当前,在南非没有有效或有效地开发,适应或实施CPG的标准方法。我们探索了当前的参与者;司机从在国家层面运作的利益相关者的角度,以及初级保健CPG发展的背景和过程。方法我们使用定性方法。抽样最初是有目的的,然后是滚雪球式抽样和进一步抽样以达到基层医疗服务提供者的代表性。记录了个人的深入访谈并逐字记录。我们使用主题内容分析来分析数据。结果从2014年6月至2015年7月,我们进行了37次深度访谈。我们发现CPG的开发和实施由于缺乏技术和方法工作的人力和财力而受到阻碍。群体之间以及国家和省级卫生部门之间的分化;以及缺乏商定的CPG开发和实施系统。一些CPG贡献者坚定地致力于改善流程,以加强沟通,证据的使用和透明度,以确保产生可靠的指导。许多受访者具有共同的价值观,并被迫解决不平等问题,但是,人们认为资源缺口为商业利益或个人议程创造了有利的环境,以推动CPG的发展进程。结论我们的发现确定了CPG开发过程中的优势和差距,以及需要指导CPG开发和实施的国家标准。根据我们的研究结果和参与者的建议,南非可能会有一个前进的方向,即通过设计支持跨部门和跨学科的协作,透明度和信誉的流程来建立一个中央协调的CPG部门,以解决这些需求和分散化方面的问题。这样的倡议将需要充足的资源来建设能力,并确保为南非初级保健提供高质量的CPG提供支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号