...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >The intraoperative use of non-opioid adjuvant analgesic agents: a survey of anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand
【24h】

The intraoperative use of non-opioid adjuvant analgesic agents: a survey of anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand

机译:术中使用非阿片类药物的辅助镇痛药:对澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师的调查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Opioids have long been the mainstay of drugs used for intra-operative analgesia. Due to their well-known short and long term side effects, the use of non-opioid analgesics has often been encouraged to decrease the dose of opioid required and minimise these side effects. The trends in using non-opioid adjuvants among Australian Anaesthetists have not been examined before. This study has attempted to determine the use of non-opioid analgesics as part of an opioid sparing practice among anaesthetists across Australia and New Zealand. A survey was distributed to 985 anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand. The questions focused on frequency of use of different adjuvants and any reasons for not using individual agents. The agents surveyed were paracetamol, dexamethasone, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), tramadol, ketamine, anticonvulsants, intravenous lidocaine, systemic alpha 2 agonists, magnesium sulphate, and beta blockers. Descriptive statistics were used and data are expressed as a percentage of response for each drug. The response rate was 33.4%. Paracetamol was the most frequently used; with 72% of the respondents describing frequent usage (defined as usage above 70% of the time); followed by parecoxib (42% reported frequent usage) and dexamethasone (35% reported frequent usage). Other adjuvants were used much less commonly, with anaesthetists reporting their frequent usage at less than 10%. The majority of respondents suggested that they would never consider dexmedetomidine, magnesium, esmolol, pregabalin or gabapentin. Perceived disincentives for the use of analgesic adjuvants varied. The main concerns were side effects, lack of evidence for benefit, and anaesthetists’ experience. The latter two were the major factors for magnesium, dexmedetomidine and esmolol. The uptake of tramadol, lidocaine and magnesium amongst respondents from anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand was poor. Gabapentin, pregabalin, dexmedetomidine and esmolol use was relatively rare. Most anaesthetists need substantial evidence before introducing a non-opioid adjuvant into their routine practice. Future trials should focus on assessing the opioid sparing benefits and relative risk of using individual non-opioid adjuvants in the perioperative period for specific procedures and patient populations.
机译:阿片类药物长期以来一直是术中镇痛的主要药物。由于其众所周知的短期和长期副作用,经常鼓励使用非阿片类镇痛药以减少所需的阿片类药物剂量并使这些副作用最小化。以前尚未研究过澳大利亚麻醉师中使用非阿片类药物佐剂的趋势。这项研究试图确定在澳大利亚和新西兰的麻醉师中使用非阿片类镇痛药作为阿片类药物节约实践的一部分。已向澳大利亚和新西兰的985名麻醉师进行了调查。问题集中在使用不同佐剂的频率以及不使用单个药物的任何原因。被调查的药物是扑热息痛,地塞米松,非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),曲马多,氯胺酮,抗惊厥药,静脉注射利多卡因,全身性α2激动剂,硫酸镁和β受体阻滞剂。使用描述性统计数据,数据表示为每种药物反应的百分比。回应率为33.4%。扑热息痛是最常用的药物。 72%的受访者表示频繁使用(定义为70%以上的时间使用);其次是帕瑞昔布(据报道经常使用的占42%)和地塞米松(据报道经常使用的占35%)。其他佐剂的使用率要低得多,麻醉师报告说它们的频繁使用率不到10%。大多数受访者表示,他们绝不会考虑右美托咪定,镁,艾司洛尔,普瑞巴林或加巴喷丁。人们对使用止痛剂的抑制作用有所不同。主要关注的问题是副作用,缺乏有益的证据以及麻醉师的经验。后两者是镁,右美托咪定和艾司洛尔的主要因素。在澳大利亚和新西兰的麻醉师中,曲马多,利多卡因和镁的吸收较差。加巴喷丁,普瑞巴林,右美托咪定和艾司洛尔的使用相对较少。大多数麻醉师在将非阿片类药物佐剂引入常规治疗之前需要大量证据。未来的试验应侧重于评估阿片类药物在特定手术过程和患者人群围手术期中节省的阿片类药物的益处以及使用非类阿片辅助剂的相对风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号