首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >Role of tube size and intranasal compression of the nasotracheal tube in respiratory pressure loss during nasotracheal intubation: a laboratory study
【24h】

Role of tube size and intranasal compression of the nasotracheal tube in respiratory pressure loss during nasotracheal intubation: a laboratory study

机译:鼻气管插管过程中管径和鼻气管鼻内压迫在呼吸压力下降中的作用:一项实验室研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Small nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) and intranasal compression of the NTT in the nasal cavity may contribute to increasing airway resistance. Since the effects of size, shape, and partial compression of the NTT on airway resistance have not been investigated, values of airway resistance with partial compression of preformed NTTs of various sizes were determined. To determine the factors affecting the respiratory pressure loss during the nasotracheal intubation, physical and fluid dynamics simulations were used. The internal minor axes of NTTs in the nasal cavity of intubated patients were measured using dial calipers. In physical and fluid dynamics simulations, pressure losses through the tubular parts, compressed parts, and slip joints of NTTs with internal diameters (IDs) of 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0?mm were estimated under partial compression. The median internal minor axes of the 7.0- and 7.5-mm ID NTTs in the nasal cavity were 5.2 (4.3–5.6) mm and 6.0 (4.2–7.0) mm, respectively. With a volumetric air flow rate of 30?L/min, pressure losses through uncompressed NTTs with IDs of 6.0-, 6.5-, 7.0-, 7.5- and 8.0-mm were 651.6?±?5.7 (6.64?±?0.06), 453.4?±?3.9 (4.62?±?0.04), 336.5?±?2.2 (3.43?±?0.02), 225.2?±?0.2 (2.30?±?0.00), and 179.0?±?1.1?Pa (1.82?±?0.01 cmH2O), respectively; the pressure losses through the slip joints were 220.3 (2.25), 131.1 (1.33), 86.8 (0.88), 57.1 (0.58), and 36.1?Pa (0.37 cmH2O), respectively; and the pressure losses through the curvature of the NTT were 71.6 (0.73), 69.0 (0.70), 64.8 (0.66), 32.5 (0.33), and 41.6?Pa (0.42 cmH2O), respectively. A maximum compression force of 34.1?N increased the pressure losses by 82.0 (0.84), 38.0 (0.39), 23.5 (0.24), 16.6 (0.17), and 9.3?Pa (0.09 cmH2O), respectively. Pressure losses through NTTs are in inverse proportion to the tubes’ IDs; greater pressure losses due to slip joints, acute bending, and partial compression of the NTT were obvious in small NTTs. Pressure losses through NTTs, especially in small NTTs, could increase the work of breathing to a greater extent than that through standard tubes; intranasal compression further increases the pressure loss.
机译:较小的鼻气管导管(NTT)和鼻腔内NTT的鼻内压迫可能有助于增加气道阻力。由于尚未研究NTT的尺寸,形状和部分压缩对气道阻力的影响,因此确定了各种尺寸的预成型NTT随部分压缩的气道阻力值。为了确定影响气管插管过程中呼吸压力损失的因素,使用了物理和流体动力学模拟。使用千分卡尺测量插管患者鼻腔内NTT的内短轴。在物理和流体动力学模拟中,在部分压缩下,估计了内径(ID)为6.0、6.5、7.0、7.5和8.0?mm的NTT的管状部件,压缩部件和滑动接头的压力损失。鼻腔中7.0毫米和7.5毫米ID NTT的中位内短轴分别为5.2(4.3-5.6)毫米和6.0(4.2-7.0)毫米。当空气体积流量为30?L / min时,通过内径为6.0-,6.5-,7.0-,7.5-和8.0-mm的未压缩NTT的压力损失为651.6?±?5.7(6.64?±?0.06), 453.4±3.9(4.62±0.04),336.5±2.2(3.43±0.02),225.2±0.2(2.30±0.00)和179.0±1.1(1.02Pa) ±?0.01 cmH2O);通过滑动接头的压力损失分别为220.3(2.25),131.1(1.33),86.8(0.88),57.1(0.58)和36.1?Pa(0.37 cmH2O);通过NTT曲率引起的压力损失分别为71.6(0.73),69.0(0.70),64.8(0.66),32.5(0.33)和41.6?Pa(0.42 cmH2O)。最大压缩力34.1?N会使压力损失分别增加82.0(0.84),38.0(0.39),23.5(0.24),16.6(0.17)和9.3?Pa(0.09 cmH2O)。通过NTT造成的压力损失与管道内径成反比;在小型NTT中,由于滑动接头,急剧弯曲和NTT的局部压缩而导致的更大压力损失是显而易见的。通过NTT产生的压力损失,尤其是在小型NTT中,比通过标准管产生的压力损失更大程度地增加了呼吸功;鼻内压缩进一步增加了压力损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号