...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial

机译:Clarus视频系统(Trachway)和直接喉镜在模拟快速序列诱导性气管插管中以环形压力进行气管插管:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. The first attempt success rates within 30?s and within 60?s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p?=?0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30?s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60?s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6?s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6?s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5?s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p?=?0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak’s adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60?s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60?s. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890 , registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered).
机译:在紧急气管插管过程中,经常采用环压(CP)快速序列感应插管(RSII)来预防吸入性肺炎。与直接喉镜(DL)相比,我们评估了CP的RSII气管插管中的CVS。一百五十名患者被随机分配到三组之一:作为视频探针的CVS(CVS-V)组,作为轻心的CVS(CVS-L)组和DL组。主要结果是评估CVS与DL相比在模拟CP的RSII中的首次尝试成功率和插管时间的功效。次要结果是检查血液动力应激反应和并发症的发生率。 CVS-V和DL组在30?s和60?s内的首次尝试成功率均高于CVS-L组(分别为p?= 0.006和0.037)。在30 s内插管成功率的组间差异无统计学意义,几乎所有患者在60 s内成功插管(CVS-L和DL组为98%,CVS-L组为96%)。 Kaplan-Meier估计量显示,CVS-V组中位插管时间为10.6?s [95%CI,7.5至13.7],CVS-L组为14.6?s [95%CI,11.1至18.0]和16.5?s [ DL组为95%CI,从15.7到17.3](按对数秩检验p <= 0.023)。但是,经过Sidak的调整后,差异并不明显。血流动力学应激反应,喉咙痛和粘膜损伤发生率的组间差异也无统计学意义。 CVS-D和DL在使用CP插管的30到60?s内可提供更高的首次插管成功率; CVS-V的插管时间明显短于其他两种插管方法。三种插管方法中的任何一种都可以在60?s内成功插管几乎所有患者。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03841890,于2019年2月15日注册(追溯注册)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号