首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision among occupational therapists across Queensland in Australia: findings from a qualitative study
【24h】

Enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision among occupational therapists across Queensland in Australia: findings from a qualitative study

机译:澳大利亚昆士兰州职业治疗师进行高质量临床监督的推动力和障碍:定性研究的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Health professionals practising in countries with dispersed populations such as Australia rely on clinical supervision for professional support. While there are directives and guidelines in place to govern clinical supervision, little is known about how it is actually conducted and what makes it effective. The purpose of this study was to explore the enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision among occupational therapists across Queensland in Australia. This qualitative study took place as part of a broader project. Individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with occupational therapy supervisees in Queensland. The interviews explored the enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision in this group. They further explored some findings from the initial quantitative study. Content analysis of the interview data resulted in eight themes. These themes were broadly around the importance of the supervisory relationship, the impact of clinical supervision and the enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision. This study identified a number of factors that were perceived to be associated with high quality clinical supervision. Supervisor-supervisee matching and fit, supervisory relationship and availability of supervisor for support in between clinical supervision sessions appeared to be associated with perceptions of higher quality of clinical supervision received. Some face-to-face contact augmented with telesupervision was found to improve perceptions of the quality of clinical supervision received via telephone. Lastly, dual roles where clinical supervision and line management were provided by the same person were not considered desirable by supervisees. A number of enablers of and barriers to high quality clinical supervision were also identified. With clinical supervision gaining increasing prominence as part of organisational and professional governance, this study provides important lessons for successful and sustainable clinical supervision in practice contexts.
机译:在人口分散的国家(例如澳大利亚)执业的卫生专业人员依靠临床监督获得专业支持。尽管有指导临床监督的指令和指南,但对其实际操作方式和有效方式知之甚少。这项研究的目的是探索澳大利亚昆士兰州职业治疗师进行高质量临床监督的推动力和障碍。这项定性研究是更广泛项目的一部分。在昆士兰州对职业治疗督导进行了单独,深入,半结构化的访谈。访谈探讨了该组高质量临床监督的推动者和障碍。他们进一步探索了最初定量研究中的一些发现。访谈数据的内容分析产生了八个主题。这些主题大致围绕着监督关系的重要性,临床监督的影响以及高质量临床监督的推动者和障碍。这项研究确定了许多与高质量临床监督有关的因素。主管-主管之间的匹配和配合,监督关系以及主管之间在临床监督会议之间的支持似乎与人们对临床监督质量更高的看法有关。发现一些增加了远程监督的面对面联系可以改善对通过电话接收的临床监督质量的认识。最后,被监督者认为由同一人提供临床监督和生产线管理的双重角色是不可取的。还确定了高质量临床监督的许多促成因素和障碍。随着临床监督日益成为组织和专业治理的一部分,这项研究为在实践环境中成功和可持续地进行临床监督提供了重要的经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号