...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Impact of a referral management “gateway” on the quality of referral letters; a retrospective time series cross sectional review
【24h】

Impact of a referral management “gateway” on the quality of referral letters; a retrospective time series cross sectional review

机译:推荐管理“门户”对推荐信质量的影响;回顾性时间序列截面回顾

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Referral management centres (RMC) for elective referrals are designed to facilitate the primary to secondary care referral path, by improving quality of referrals and easing pressures on finite secondary care services, without inadvertently compromising patient care. This study aimed to evaluate whether the introduction of a RMC which includes triage and feedback improved the quality of elective outpatient referral letters. Methods Retrospective, time-series, cross-sectional review involving 47 general practices in one primary care trust (PCT) in South-East England. Comparison of a random sample of referral letters at baseline (n?=?301) and after seven months of referral management (n?=?280). Letters were assessed for inclusion of four core pieces of information which are used locally to monitor referral quality (blood pressure, body mass index, past medical history, medication history) and against research-based quality criteria for referral letters (provision of clinical information and clarity of reason for referral). Results Following introduction of the RMC, the proportion of letters containing each of the core items increased compared to baseline. Statistically significant increases in the recording of ‘past medical history’ (from 71% to 84%, p?‘medication history’ (78% to 87%, p?=?0.006) were observed. Forty four percent of letters met the research-based quality criteria at baseline but there was no significant change in quality of referral letters judged on these criteria across the two time periods. Conclusion Introduction of RMC has improved the inclusion of past medical history and medication history in referral letters, but not other measures of quality. In approximately half of letters there remains room for further improvement.
机译:背景选择性转诊的转诊管理中心(RMC)旨在通过提高转诊质量和缓解有限的二级医疗服务压力来促进初级到二级医疗转诊路径,而不会无意间损害患者的医疗服务。这项研究旨在评估引入包括分类和反馈的RMC是否提高了选择性门诊转诊信的质量。方法回顾性,时间序列,横断面审查,涉及英格兰东南部一个初级保健信托(PCT)中的47种常规做法。在基线(n == 301)和七个月的推荐管理后(n == 280)对推荐信的随机样本进行比较。对信件进行了评估,以包括四个核心信息,这些信息在当地用于监测推荐信质量(血压,体重指数,既往病史,用药史),并根据基于研究的推荐信质量标准(提供临床信息和推荐理由的明确性)。结果引入RMC之后,包含每个核心项的字母所占的比例与基线相比有所增加。记录“过去病史”的统计显着增加(从71%增至84%,p'药物史'(78%增至87%,p?= 0.006),有44%的信件完成了研究。基于基线的质量标准,但在两个时间段内根据这些标准判断的推荐信的质量没有显着变化结论结论RMC的引入改善了推荐信中既往病史和用药史的纳入,但没有其他措施在大约一半的字母中,仍有进一步改进的空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号