首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems
【24h】

Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems

机译:谈论质量:探索如何在欧洲医院和医疗保健系统中概念化“质量”

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Conceptualization of quality of care – in terms of what individuals, groups and organizations include in their meaning of quality, is an unexplored research area. It is important to understand how quality is conceptualised as a means to successfully implement improvement efforts and bridge potential disconnect in language about quality between system levels, professions, and clinical services. The aim is therefore to explore and compare conceptualization of quality among national bodies (macro level), senior hospital managers (meso level), and professional groups within clinical micro systems (micro level) in a cross-national study. Methods This cross-national multi-level case study combines analysis of national policy documents and regulations at the macro level with semi-structured interviews (383) and non-participant observation (803?hours) of key meetings and shadowing of staff at the meso and micro levels in ten purposively sampled European hospitals (England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and Norway). Fieldwork at the meso and micro levels was undertaken over a 12-month period (2011–2012) and different types of micro systems were included (maternity, oncology, orthopaedics, elderly care, intensive care, and geriatrics). Results The three quality dimensions clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience were incorporated in macro level policies in all countries. Senior hospital managers adopted a similar conceptualization, but also included efficiency and costs in their conceptualization of quality. ‘Quality’ in the forms of measuring indicators and performance management were dominant among senior hospital managers (with clinical and non-clinical background). The differential emphasis on the three quality dimensions was strongly linked to professional roles, personal ideas, and beliefs at the micro level. Clinical effectiveness was dominant among physicians (evidence-based approach), while patient experience was dominant among nurses (patient-centered care, enough time to talk with patients). Conceptualization varied between micro systems depending on the type of services provided. Conclusion The quality conceptualization differed across system levels (macro-meso-micro), among professional groups (nurses, doctors, managers), and between the studied micro systems in our ten sampled European hospitals. This entails a managerial alignment challenge translating macro level quality definitions into different local contexts.
机译:背景护理质量的概念化–就个人,团体和组织的质量意义而言,是一个尚未探索的研究领域。重要的是要了解如何将质量概念化,以此作为成功实施改进工作并弥合系统级别,专业和临床服务之间有关质量的语言中潜在的脱节的手段。因此,目的是在跨国研究中探索和比较国家机构(宏观级别),高级医院管理人员(中观级别)和临床微观系统内的专业团体(微观级别)之间的质量概念。方法这项跨国多层次案例研究将宏观层面的国家政策文件和法规分析与半结构化访谈(383)和关键会议的非参与者观察(803小时)以及中观工作人员的影子相结合和十个有针对性地抽样的欧洲医院(英格兰,荷兰,葡萄牙,瑞典和挪威)的微量水平。在过去的12个月(2011-2012年)内进行了中观和微观水平的实地调查,并纳入了不同类型的微观系统(产妇,肿瘤科,骨科,老年护理,重症监护和老年医学)。结果所有国家/地区的宏观政策都将三个质量维度的临床有效性,患者安全性和患者经验纳入了政策范围。医院高级管理人员采用了类似的概念,但在质量概念中也包括了效率和成本。衡量指标和绩效管理等形式的“质量”在高级医院管理人员(具有临床和非临床背景)中占主导地位。对三个质量维度的不同强调与微观层面的专业角色,个人想法和信念紧密相关。临床效果在医生中占主导地位(基于证据的方法),而患者的经验在护士中占主导地位(以患者为中心的护理,有足够的时间与患者交谈)。微型系统之间的概念化因提供的服务类型而异。结论质量概念在整个系统级别(宏观-微观-微观),专业群体(护士,医生,管理人员)以及我们在十家欧洲医院中研究的微观系统之间都存在差异。这带来了管理一致性挑战,需要将宏观质量定义转换为不同的本地环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号