首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review
【24h】

Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review

机译:从医院到家庭的老年人过渡护理干预后的高质量护理结果:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Provision of high quality transitional care is a challenge for health care providers in many western countries. This systematic review was conducted to (1) identify and synthesise research, using randomised control trial designs, on the quality of transitional care interventions compared with standard hospital discharge for older people with chronic illnesses, and (2) make recommendations for research and practice. Methods Eight databases were searched; CINAHL, Psychinfo, Medline, Proquest, Academic Search Complete, Masterfile Premier, SocIndex, Humanities and Social Sciences Collection, in addition to the Cochrane Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Institute and Google Scholar. Results were screened to identify peer reviewed journal articles reporting analysis of quality indicator outcomes in relation to a transitional care intervention involving discharge care in hospital and follow-up support in the home. Studies were limited to those published between January 1990 and May 2013. Study participants included people 60?years of age or older living in their own homes who were undergoing care transitions from hospital to home. Data relating to study characteristics and research findings were extracted from the included articles. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for risk of bias. Results Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Transitional care interventions reported in most studies reduced re-hospitalizations, with the exception of general practitioner and primary care nurse models. All 12 studies included outcome measures of re-hospitalization and length of stay indicating a quality focus on effectiveness, efficiency, and safety/risk. Patient satisfaction was assessed in six of the 12 studies and was mostly found to be high. Other outcomes reflecting person and family centred care were limited including those pertaining to the patient and carer experience, carer burden and support, and emotional support for older people and their carers. Limited outcome measures were reported reflecting timeliness, equity, efficiencies for community providers, and symptom management. Conclusions Gaps in the evidence base were apparent in the quality domains of timeliness, equity, efficiencies for community providers, effectiveness/symptom management, and domains of person and family centred care. Further research that involves the person and their family/caregiver in transitional care interventions is needed.
机译:背景技术在许多西方国家,提供高质量的过渡性护理对医疗服务提供者来说都是一个挑战。进行该系统评价的目的是:(1)使用随机对照试验设计确定和综合有关慢性病老年人的过渡护理干预质量与标准出院质量的研究,以及(2)为研究和实践提出建议。方法检索8个数据库。除了Cochrane合作,乔安娜·布里格斯学院和Google学术搜索之外,CINAHL,Psychinfo,Medline,Proquest,Academic Search Complete,Masterfile Premier,SocIndex,人文社会科学丛书。筛选结果以鉴定同行评审的期刊文章,这些文章报告了与过渡护理干预有关的质量指标结果分析,该干预涉及医院的出院护理和家庭的后续支持。研究仅限于1990年1月至2013年5月之间发表的研究。研究对象包括居住在自己家中的60岁以上的人,他们正在接受从医院到家的护理过渡。与研究特征和研究结果有关的数据是从所包括的文章中提取的。两名审稿人独立评估了研究的偏倚风险。结果12篇文章符合入选标准。大多数研究中报告的过渡护理干预措施减少了重新住院的机会,但全科医生和初级护理护士模式除外。所有12项研究均包括重新住院治疗和住院时间的结果指标,表明质量侧重于有效性,效率和安全性/风险。在12项研究中的6项中评估了患者满意度,并且大多数情况下满意度很高。反映以人和家庭为中心的护理的其他结果是有限的,包括与患者和护理人员的经历,护理人员的负担和支持以及对老年人及其护理人员的情感支持有关的结果。据报道,有限的结果指标反映了及时性,公平性,社区提供者的效率和症状管理。结论在及时性,公平性,社区提供者的效率,有效性/症状管理以及以人和家庭为中心的护理等质量领域,证据基础上的差距是显而易见的。需要对该人及其家人/护理人员进行过渡护理干预的进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号