首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
【24h】

An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector

机译:乌干达公共部门基本药物和保健用品资金分配公平性的探索性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To ascertain equity in financing for essential medicines and health supplies (EMHS) in Uganda, this paper explores the relationships among government funding allocations for EMHS, patient load, and medicines availability across facilities at different levels of care. Methods We collected data on EMHS allocations and availability of selected vital medicines from 43 purposively sampled hospitals and the highest level health centers (HC IV), 44 randomly selected lower-level health facilities (HC II, III), and from over 400 facility health information system records and National Medical Stores records. The data were analyzed to determine allocations per patient within and across levels of care and the effects of allocations on product availability. Results EMHS funding allocations per patient varied widely within facilities at the same level, and allocations per patient between levels overlapped considerably. For example, HC IV allocations per patient ranged from US$0.25 to US$2.14 (1:9 ratio of lowest to highest allocation), and over 75?% of HC IV facilities had the same or lower average allocation per patient than HC III facilities. Overall, 43?% of all the facilities had optimal stock levels, 27?% were understocked, and 30?% were overstocked. Using simulations, we reduced the ratio between the highest and lowest allocations per patient within a level of care to less than two and eliminated the overlap in allocation per patient between levels. Conclusions Inequity in EMHS allocation is demonstrated by the wide range of funding allocations per patient and the corresponding disparities in medicines availability. We show that using patient load to calculate EMHS allocations has the potential to improve equity significantly. However, more research in this area is urgently needed. Trial registration The article does not report any results of human participants. It is implemented in collaboration with the Uganda’s Ministry of Health, Pharmacy Division.
机译:背景技术为了确定乌干达基本药物和卫生用品(EMHS)的融资公平性,本文探讨了政府对EMHS的资金分配,患者负担以及不同护理级别机构间药品供应之间的关系。方法我们收集了43家有针对性的样本医院和最高级别的卫生中心(HC IV),44个随机选择的低级卫生机构(HC II,III)和400多家机构卫生所提供的EMHS分配和所选重要药物的可用性的数据信息系统记录和National Medical Stores记录。分析数据以确定在护理级别内和跨护理级别的每个患者的分配以及分配对产品可用性的影响。结果在同一级别的设施中,每个患者的EMHS资金分配相差很大,并且两个级别之间的每个患者的分配有很大的重叠。例如,每位患者的HC IV设施的分配范围为0.25美元至2.14美元(最低与最高分配比例为1:9的比率),并且超过75%的HC IV设施的每位患者平均分配与HC III设施相同或更低。总体而言,所有设施的43%具有最佳库存水平,27%的库存不足,30%的库存过多。通过模拟,我们将护理级别中每位患者的最高分配与最低分配之间的比率降低到小于两个,并消除了各级之间每位患者的分配重叠。结论EMHS分配的不平等表现为每位患者的资金分配范围广泛,以及相应的药品供应差异。我们表明,使用患者负荷来计算EMHS分配有可能显着提高公平性。但是,迫切需要在这一领域进行更多的研究。试用注册本文不报告人类参与者的任何结果。与乌干达卫生部药房部合作实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号