...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Towards comprehensive and transparent reporting: context-specific additions to the ICF taxonomy for medical evaluations of work capacity involving claimants with chronic widespread pain and low back pain
【24h】

Towards comprehensive and transparent reporting: context-specific additions to the ICF taxonomy for medical evaluations of work capacity involving claimants with chronic widespread pain and low back pain

机译:迈向全面透明的报告:ICF分类法中针对特定情况的补充,用于对工作能力进行医学评估的医学评估,涉及患有慢性广泛性疼痛和下背痛的索赔人

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Medical evaluations of work capacity provide key information for decisions on a claimant’s eligibility for disability benefits. In recent years, the evaluations have been increasingly criticized for low transparency and poor standardization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a comprehensive spectrum of categories for reporting functioning and its determinants in terms of impairments and contextual factors and could facilitate transparent and standardized documentation of medical evaluations of work capacity. However, the comprehensiveness of the ICF taxonomy in this particular context has not been empirically examined. In this study, we wanted to identify potential context-specific additions to the ICF for its application in medical evaluations of work capacity involving chronic widespread pain (CWP) and low back pain (LBP). Methods A retrospective content analysis of Swiss medical reports was conducted by using the ICF for data coding. Concepts not appropriately classifiable with ICF categories were labeled as specification categories (i.e. context-specific additions) and were assigned to predefined specification areas (i.e. precision, coverage, personal factors, and broad concepts). Relevant specification categories for medical evaluations of work capacity involving CWP and LBP were determined by calculating their relative frequency across reports and setting a relevance threshold. Results Forty-three specification categories for CWP and fifty-two for LBP reports passed the threshold. In both groups of reports, precision was the most frequent specification area, followed by personal factors. Conclusions The ICF taxonomy represents a universally applicable standard for reporting health and functioning information. However, when applying the ICF for comprehensive and transparent reporting in medical evaluations of work capacity involving CWP and LBP context-specific additions are needed. This is particularly true for the documentation of specific pain-related issues, work activities and personal factors. To ensure the practicability of the multidisciplinary evaluation process, the large number of ICF categories and context-specific additions necessary for comprehensive documentation could be specifically allocated to the disciplines in charge of their assessment.
机译:背景技术对工作能力的医学评估可为决策者提供关键信息,以决定索赔人的残障福利资格。近年来,由于透明度低和标准化不佳,评估受到越来越多的批评。 《国际功能,残疾与健康分类》(ICF)提供了全面的类别类别,用于报告功能,损害和背景因素方面的决定因素,并且可以促进对工作能力医学评估的透明和标准化文档。但是,在此特定情况下,ICF分类法的全面性尚未经过经验检验。在这项研究中,我们希望确定ICF的潜在上下文特定添加,以将其应用于涉及慢性广泛性疼痛(CWP)和下背痛(LBP)的工作能力的医学评估中。方法使用ICF进行数据编码,对瑞士医疗报告进行回顾性内容分析。无法用ICF类别适当分类的概念被标记为规范类别(即,特定于上下文的添加),并被分配给预定义的规范区域(即精度,覆盖范围,个人因素和广泛的概念)。通过计算报告中的相对频率并设置相关性阈值,可以确定涉及CWP和LBP的工作能力医学评估的相关规范类别。结果CWP的43个规范类别和LBP报告的52个规范类别通过阈值。在两组报告中,精度都是最常见的规范领域,其次是个人因素。结论ICF分类法是报告健康和功能信息的通用标准。但是,在将ICF应用于涉及CWP和LBP的工作能力的医学评估中,以进行全面,透明的报告时,需要根据具体情况进行补充。对于特定的疼痛相关问题,工作活动和个人因素的记录尤其如此。为了确保多学科评估过程的实用性,可以将大量ICF类别和针对具体文档的特定上下文附加项专门分配给负责其评估的学科。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号