首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: Cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases
【24h】

Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: Cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases

机译:在美国,以色列和荷兰比较接受物理治疗的患者的患者特征和治疗过程:来自三个临床数据库的数据的横断面分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Many assume that outcomes from physical therapy research in one country can be generalized to other countries. However, no well designed studies comparing outcomes among countries have been conducted. In this exploratory study, our goal was to compare patient demographics and treatment processes in outpatient physical therapy practice in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands. Methods Cross-sectional data from three different clinical databases were examined. Data were selected for patients aged 18 years and older and started an episode of outpatient therapy between January 1st 2005 and December 31st 2005. Results are based on data from approximately 63,000 patients from the United States, 100,000 from Israel and 12,000 from the Netherlands. Results Age, gender and the body part treated were similar in the three countries. Differences existed in episode duration of the health problem, with more patients with chronic complaints treated in the United States and Israel compared to the Netherlands. In the United States and Israel, physical agents and mechanical modalities were applied more often than in the Netherlands. The mean number of visits per treatment episode, adjusted for age, gender, and episode duration, varied from 8 in Israel to 11 in the United States and the Netherlands. Conclusion The current study showed that clinical databases can be used for comparing patient demographic characteristics and for identifying similarities and differences among countries in physical therapy practice. However, terminology used to describe treatment processes and classify patients was different among databases. More standardisation is required to enable more detailed comparisons. Nevertheless the differences found in number of treatment visits per episode imply that one has to be careful to generalize outcomes from physical therapy research from one country to another.
机译:背景许多人认为,一个国家进行物理疗法研究的结果可以推广到其他国家。但是,尚未进行精心设计的比较国家间结果的研究。在这项探索性研究中,我们的目标是比较美国,以色列和荷兰在门诊物理治疗实践中的患者人口统计学和治疗过程。方法检查来自三个不同临床数据库的横断面数据。选择18岁及以上患者的数据,并在2005年1月1日至2005年12月31日开始进行门诊治疗。结果基于来自美国的约63,000名患者,以色列的100,000名患者和荷兰的12,000名患者的数据。结果这三个国家的年龄,性别和身体部位相似。健康问题发作持续时间存在差异,与荷兰相比,在美国和以色列接受治疗的慢性病患者更多。与荷兰相比,在美国和以色列使用物理代理和机械方式的频率更高。根据年龄,性别和发作时间进行调整后,每次治疗发作的平均就诊次数从以色列的8次到美国和荷兰的11次不等。结论当前的研究表明,临床数据库可用于比较患者的人口统计学特征,并确定各国在物理治疗实践中的异同。但是,数据库之间用于描述治疗过程和分类患者的术语有所不同。需要进行更多标准化才能进行更详细的比较。但是,每集治疗访视次数的差异意味着一个国家必须谨慎对待从一个国家到另一个国家的物理疗法研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号