首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Evaluating the sub-national fidelity of national Initiatives in decentralized health systems: Integrated Primary Health Care Governance in Nigeria
【24h】

Evaluating the sub-national fidelity of national Initiatives in decentralized health systems: Integrated Primary Health Care Governance in Nigeria

机译:评估权力下放卫生系统中国家举措的地方保真度:尼日利亚综合初级卫生保健治理

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Policy making, translation and implementation in politically and administratively decentralized systems can be challenging. Beyond the mere sub-national acceptance of national initiatives, adherence to policy implementation processes is often poor, particularly in low and middle-income countries. In this study, we explore the implementation fidelity of integrated PHC governance policy in Nigeria’s decentralized governance system and its implications on closing implementation gaps with respect to other top-down health policies and initiatives. Methods Having engaged policy makers, we identified 9 core components of the policy (Governance, Legislation, Minimum Service Package, Repositioning, Systems Development, Operational Guidelines, Human Resources, Funding Structure, and Office Establishment). We evaluated the level and pattern of implementation at state level as compared to the national guidelines using a scorecard approach. Results Contrary to national government’s assessment of level of compliance, we found that sub-national governments exercised significant discretion with respect to the implementation of core components of the policy. Whereas 35 and 32% of states fully met national criteria for the structural domains of “Office Establishment” and Legislation” respectively, no state was fully compliant to “Human Resource Management” and “Funding” requirements, which are more indicative of functionality. The pattern of implementation suggests that, rather than implementing to improve outcomes, state governments may be more interested in executing low hanging fruits in order to access national incentives. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity in providing evidence of implementation gaps towards improving policy execution, particularly in decentralized health systems. This approach will help national policy makers identify more effective ways of supporting lower tiers of governance towards improvement of health systems and outcomes.
机译:背景技术在政治和行政权力下放系统中的决策,翻译和实施可能具有挑战性。除了仅次于国家接受国家举措外,对政策实施过程的遵守往往很差,特别是在中低收入国家。在这项研究中,我们探讨了尼日利亚权力下放的治理体系中实施PHC一体化综合治理政策的忠实度,以及与其他自上而下的卫生政策和倡议相比对缩小实施差距的影响。方法与政策制定者接触后,我们确定了政策的9个核心组成部分(治理,立法,最低服务包,重新定位,系统开发,操作指南,人力资源,资金结构和办公室设立)。与记分卡方法相比,我们评估了州一级与国家指南相比的实施水平和模式。结果与国家政府对合规水平的评估相反,我们发现地方政府在实施政策的核心内容方面行使了重大酌处权。分别有35%和32%的州完全满足“办公室设立”和“立法”的结构领域的国家标准,而没有州完全符合“人力资源管理”和“资金”要求,这更能说明其功能。实施模式表明,州政府可能会更感兴趣于执行低下的成果以获取国家激励措施,而不是实施以提高成果的措施。结论我们的研究强调了评估实施保真度在提供实施差距以改善政策执行(特别是在分散式卫生系统中)方面的重要性的重要性。这种方法将帮助国家决策者确定更有效的方法来支持较低级别的治理,以改善卫生系统和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号