...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
【24h】

Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital

机译:腹腔镜与开放式阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结果和成本分析:在地区医院工作了4年

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Laparoscopic appendectomy is not yet unanimously considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of its higher operative time, intra-abdominal abscess risk, and costs compared to open appendectomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes and cost of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a district hospital. Methods A retrospective analysis of 230 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Division of General Surgery of the Civil Hospital of Ragusa, Italy, from May 2008 to May 2012 was performed. The variables analyzed included patients data (age, gender, previous abdominal surgery, preoperative WBC count, duration of symptoms, ASA risk score), rate of uncomplicated or complicated appendicitis, operative time, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and total costs. The patients were divided in two groups according to the surgical approach and compared for each variable. The results were analyzed using the t Student test for quantitative variables, and the Chi-square test with Yates correction and Fisher exact test for categorical. Results Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 139 patients, open appendectomy in 91. Two cases (1.4%) were converted to open procedure and included in the laparoscopic group data. Patient data and rate of complicated appendicitis were similar in the two study groups. There was no statistical difference (p?=?0.476) in the mean operative time between the laparoscopic (52.2?min; range, 20–155) and open appendectomy (49.3?min; range, 20–110) groups. The overall incidence of minor and major complications was significantly lower (p?=?0.006) after laparoscopic appendectomy (2.9%, 4 cases) than after open appendectomy (13.2%, 12 cases); rate of intra-abdominal abscess were similar. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (p?=?0.001) in laparoscopic group (2.75?days; range, 1–8) than in open group (3.87?days; range, 1–19). The mean total cost was 2282 Euro in laparoscopic group and 2337 Euro in open group, with a no significant difference of 55 Euro (p?=?0.812). Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and similar operative time, intra-abdominal abscess rate, and total costs, compared with open appendectomy. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy can be recommended as preferred approach in acute appendicitis.
机译:背景技术与开放式阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术尚未被一致认为是治疗急性阑尾炎的“黄金标准”,因为它的手术时间更长,腹腔内脓肿的风险更高且成本更高。本研究旨在比较地区医院的腹腔镜和开放式阑尾切除术的结局和费用。方法回顾性分析2008年5月至2012年5月在意大利拉古萨市民医院普通外科进行阑尾切除术的230例患者。分析的变量包括患者数据(年龄,性别,以前的腹部手术,术前白细胞计数,症状持续时间,ASA风险评分),未并发或并发阑尾炎的发生率,手术时间,术后并发症,住院时间和总费用。根据手术方法将患者分为两组,并比较每个变量。使用t学生检验分析定量变量,对结果进行分析,对卡方检验进行Yates校正,使用Fisher精确检验进行分类。结果139例患者进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术,其中91例进行了开放性阑尾切除术。2例(1.4%)转换为开放性手术,并纳入了腹腔镜组数据。在两个研究组中,患者数据和复杂性阑尾炎的发生率相似。腹腔镜手术组(52.2?min;范围20–155)和开腹阑尾切除术(49.3?min;范围20–110)之间的平均手术时间无统计学差异(p?=?0.476)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术后(2.9%,4例)的轻微和主要并发症的总发生率显着低于开腹阑尾切除术后(13.2%,12例)(p = 0.006);腹腔内脓肿的发生率相似。腹腔镜组(2.75天,范围1-8)的住院时间明显短于开放组(3.87天,范围1-19)(p = 0.001)。腹腔镜组的平均总费用为2282欧元,开放组的平均总费用为2337欧元,差异无显着性(55欧元)(p = 0.812)。结论与开放式阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术并发症少,住院时间短,手术时间,腹腔内脓肿率和总费用相近。因此,可推荐腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为急性阑尾炎的首选治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号