首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Asthma control cost-utility randomized trial evaluation (ACCURATE): the goals of asthma treatment
【24h】

Asthma control cost-utility randomized trial evaluation (ACCURATE): the goals of asthma treatment

机译:哮喘控制成本-效用随机试验评估(准确):哮喘治疗的目标

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite the availability of effective therapies, asthma remains a source of significant morbidity and use of health care resources. The central research question of the ACCURATE trial is whether maximal doses of (combination) therapy should be used for long periods in an attempt to achieve complete control of all features of asthma. An additional question is whether patients and society value the potential incremental benefit, if any, sufficiently to concur with such a treatment approach. We assessed patient preferences and cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies aimed at achieving different levels of clinical control: 1. sufficiently controlled asthma 2. strictly controlled asthma 3. strictly controlled asthma based on exhaled nitric oxide as an additional disease marker Design 720 Patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma from general practices with a practice nurse, age 18-50 yr, daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (more then 3 months usage of inhaled corticosteroids in the previous year), will be identified via patient registries of general practices in the Leiden, Nijmegen, and Amsterdam areas in The Netherlands. The design is a 12-month cluster-randomised parallel trial with 40 general practices in each of the three arms. The patients will visit the general practice at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. At each planned and unplanned visit to the general practice treatment will be adjusted with support of an internet-based asthma monitoring system supervised by a central coordinating specialist nurse. Patient preferences and utilities will be assessed by questionnaire and interview. Data on asthma control, treatment step, adherence to treatment, utilities and costs will be obtained every 3 months and at each unplanned visit. Differences in societal costs (medication, other (health) care and productivity) will be compared to differences in the number of limited activity days and in quality adjusted life years (Dutch EQ5D, SF6D, e-TTO, VAS). This is the first study to assess patient preferences and cost-effectiveness of asthma treatment strategies driven by different target levels of asthma control. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR1756
机译:背景技术尽管可获得有效的疗法,哮喘仍是严重发病和医疗资源使用的来源。 ACCURATE试验的中心研究问题是,是否应长期使用(联合)治疗的最大剂量,以期完全控制哮喘的所有特征。另一个问题是,患者和社会是否看重潜在的增量收益(如果有的话)是否足以与这种治疗方法保持一致。我们评估了旨在实现不同水平临床控制的三种治疗策略的患者偏爱和成本效益:1.充分控制哮喘2.严格控制哮喘3.严格控制哮喘是基于呼出的一氧化氮作为附加疾病标志物设计720例将通过患者常规登记中的患者登记处确定,由一名18-50岁年龄的执业护士从日常实践中引起的轻度至中度持续性哮喘,每天接受吸入类固醇激素治疗(上一年使用吸入性皮质类固醇激素超过3个月)。荷兰的莱顿,奈梅亨和阿姆斯特丹地区。该设计是为期12个月的整群随机平行试验,三个部门各有40个一般实践。患者将在基线,3、6、9和12个月就诊。在每次计划和非计划访问的全科医师治疗中,将在由中央协调专家护士监督的基于互联网的哮喘监测系统的支持下进行调整。患者的喜好和效用将通过问卷调查和访谈进行评估。每3个月和每次计划外就诊都将获得有关哮喘控制,治疗步骤,治疗依从性,效用和费用的数据。将社会成本(药物,其他(保健)护理和生产力)的差异与有限活动天数和质量调整生命年(荷兰EQ5D,SF6D,e-TTO,VAS)的差异进行比较。这是第一项评估患者偏好和哮喘控制策略成本效益的研究,该策略由不同的哮喘控制目标水平决定。试用注册荷兰试用注册(NTR):NTR1756

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号