首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >The use of inhaled antibiotic therapy in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis: a systematic review
【24h】

The use of inhaled antibiotic therapy in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis: a systematic review

机译:吸入性抗生素疗法在呼吸机相关性肺炎和气管支气管炎中的应用:系统评价

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Ventilator-associated respiratory infections (tracheobronchitis, pneumonia) contribute significant morbidity and mortality to adults receiving care in intensive care units (ICU). Administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, the current standard of care, may have systemic adverse effects. The efficacy of aerosolized antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated respiratory infections remains unclear. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of aerosolized antibiotics in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and tracheobronchitis (VAT), using the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Methods We conducted a search of three databases (PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane Collaboration) for randomized, controlled trials studying the use of nebulized antibiotics in VAP and VAT that measured clinical cure (e.g., change in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score) as an outcome measurement. We augmented the electronic searches with hand searches of the references for any narrative review articles as well as any article included in the systematic review. Included studies were examined for risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook’s “Risk of Bias” assessment tool. Results Six studies met full inclusion criteria. For the systemic review’s primary outcome (clinical cure), two studies found clinically and statistically significant improvements in measures of VAP cure while four found no statistically significant difference in measurements of cure. No studies found inferiority of aerosolized antibiotics. The included studies had various degrees of biases, particularly in the performance and detection bias domains. Given that outcome measures of clinical cure were not uniform, we were unable to conduct a meta-analysis. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence for the use of inhaled antibiotic therapy as primary or adjuvant treatment of VAP or VAT. Additional, better-powered randomized-controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy of inhaled antibiotic therapy for VAP and VAT.
机译:背景技术与呼吸机相关的呼吸道感染(气管支气管炎,肺炎)对在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗的成年人造成明显的发病率和死亡率。目前的标准治疗-广谱静脉注射抗生素可能会导致全身性不良反应。雾化抗生素治疗呼吸机相关呼吸道感染的功效仍不清楚。我们的目标是使用Cochrane协作指南对雾化抗生素在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)和气管支气管炎(VAT)中的疗效进行系统的评估。方法我们搜索了三个数据库(PubMed,Web of Knowledge和Cochrane Collaboration)以进行随机对照试验,这些试验研究了雾化抗生素在VAP和VAT中的使用,这些药物测量了临床治愈率(例如,临床肺部感染评分的变化)。结果测量。我们通过人工搜索参考文献来增加叙事性评论文章以及系统评价中包含的任何文章的电子搜索范围。使用Cochrane手册的“偏见风险”评估工具检查了纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果六项研究符合完全纳入标准。对于系统评价的主要结局(临床治愈),两项研究发现VAP治愈率在临床和统计学上都有显着改善,而四项研究发现治愈率在统计学上无显着差异。没有研究发现雾化抗生素的劣势。纳入的研究具有不同程度的偏差,尤其是在性能和​​检测偏差领域。鉴于临床治疗的结局指标不统一,我们无法进行荟萃分析。结论尚无足够的证据证明吸入性抗生素疗法可作为VAP或VAT的主要或辅助治疗。需要其他功能更强大的随机对照试验来评估吸入性抗生素治疗对VAP和VAT的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号