...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care >Determining starting basal rates of insulin infusion for insulin pump users: a comparison between methods
【24h】

Determining starting basal rates of insulin infusion for insulin pump users: a comparison between methods

机译:确定胰岛素泵使用者的胰岛素输注起始基础速率:方法之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective We aimed to assess the accuracy and safety of presently available methods of estimating starting basal insulin rates for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, and to compare them against an empirically derived standard basal rate and a newly developed regression formula. Research design and methods Data on 61 patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy and 34 patients with type 2 diabetes on CSII were reviewed. Patient data were first analyzed for correlations between initial patient parameters and final basal rates. Starting basal rates were then retrospectively calculated for these patients according to the weight-based method (WB-M), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin method (TDD-M), a flat empiric value, and a new formula developed by regression analysis of clinical data. These 4 methods were subsequently compared in their accuracy and potential risk of hypoglycemia. Results For type 1 diabetes, patient weight and TDD of long-acting insulin correlated with final basal rates. Both the regression formula and the TDD-M appeared safer than the WB-M and empirical estimates. For type 2 diabetes, only patient TDD of long-acting insulin correlated with final basal rates. The regression formula was significantly more accurate for patients with type 2 diabetes overall, but the TDD-M estimate was marginally safer. Conclusions The pre-existing TDD-M was found to be the safest presently recommended estimate of initial basal rates for pump initiation in both type 1 and 2 diabetes. The best-fit regression was found to have potential use for type 2 CSII initiation.
机译:目的我们旨在评估估计1型和2型糖尿病患者起始基础胰岛素率的现有方法的准确性和安全性,并将其与根据经验得出的标准基础率和最新开发的回归公式进行比较。研究设计和方法回顾了61例连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗的1型糖尿病患者和34例CSII治疗的2型糖尿病患者的数据。首先分析患者数据,以了解初始患者参数与最终基础率之间的相关性。然后根据基于体重的方法(WB-M),胰岛素方法的每日总剂量(TDD)(TDD-M),固定的经验值和由临床数据的回归分析。随后比较了这4种方法的准确性和低血糖的潜在风险。结果对于1型糖尿病,患者体重和长效胰岛素的TDD与最终基础率相关。回归公式和TDD-M都比WB-M和经验估计都更安全。对于2型糖尿病,只有长效胰岛素的患者TDD与最终基础率相关。总体而言,回归公式对于2型糖尿病患者更为准确,但TDD-M估计值稍为安全。结论发现现有的TDD-M是目前推荐的1型和2型糖尿病患者泵吸初始基础率的最安全估计。发现最适合的回归可能会用于2型CSII起始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号