...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Women s Health >5-Aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy
【24h】

5-Aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy

机译:基于5-氨基乙酰丙酸的荧光光谱法和常规阴道镜在体内检测宫颈癌前病变

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Sensitized fluorescence diagnostics are based on selective accumulation of photosensitizer in the tissue where carcinogenesis has started. The present study compared topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-based fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) in vivo with conventional colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection. Methods We enrolled 48 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of high-grade changes in cervical cytology. Every inspected cervix was divided in to quadrants, and there were 174 quadrants included in the study. Each patient had a cytological smear, colposcopy, FS and histopathological analysis. For FS, 3% 5-ALA cream was used topically and after an average 135?min incubation, fluorescence spectra were recorded from the cervix in vivo. FS and colposcopy results were correlated with histopathology. Results All spectra were evaluated by a ratio of the protoporphyrin IX fluorescence intensity at 634?nm and autofluorescence intensity at 510?nm. For proper grouping of low-risk and high-risk cases, a threshold of 3.87 was calculated. Data per quadrant showed that FS had higher sensitivity than colposcopy (71.7% vs 67.4%) but specificity was greater for colposcopy (86.6% vs 75.6%). Combination of the methods showed higher sensitivity (88.0% vs 67.4%) but reduced specificity (88.0% and 69.5%), but it had the highest number of correctly identified high-risk changes and the highest (79.3%) accuracy. Data for each patient showed FS sensitivity of 91.2%, which was greater than for colposcopy (88.2%). Higher overdiagnosis resulted in decreased specificity for fluorescence methodology—71.4% versus 78.6% for colposcopy. In both cases, accuracy was 85.4% and effectiveness was >80%, which means that both methods can be used to determine high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnostic sensitivity of 97.1% for this complementary diagnosis indicates that it could be the best choice for detection of high-risk changes. Conclusions 5-ALA-based FS is an objective method, requiring short-term administration for appropriate fluorescence measurements. FS is a promising diagnostic tool with similar accuracy as colposcopy but with the potential advantage of providing objective results.
机译:背景技术敏感的荧光诊断是基于光敏剂在开始致癌的组织中的选择性积累。本研究比较了基于局部5-氨基乙酰丙酸(5-ALA)的荧光光谱(FS)与常规阴道镜在体内的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)检测。方法我们纳入了48例因宫颈细胞学高度改变而进行阴道镜检查的患者。每个检查的子宫颈均分为四部分,研究中包括174个象限。每例患者均进行了细胞学涂片检查,阴道镜检查,FS和组织病理学分析。对于FS,局部使用3%的5-ALA乳膏,平均温育135分钟后,从体内记录子宫颈的荧光光谱。 FS和阴道镜检查结果与组织病理学相关。结果所有光谱通过原卟啉IX在634nm处的荧光强度与510nm处的自发荧光强度之比进行评估。对于低风险和高风险病例的正确分组,计算得出的阈值为3.87。每象限的数据显示,FS的敏感性高于阴道镜检查(71.7%比67.4%),但阴道镜检查的特异性更高(86.6%比75.6%)。这些方法的组合显示出较高的灵敏度(88.0%比67.4%),但特异性降低(88.0%和69.5%),但是它具有最高数量的可正确识别的高风险变化和最高的准确性(79.3%)。每个患者的数据显示FS敏感性为91.2%,高于阴道镜检查的敏感性(88.2%)。较高的过度诊断率导致荧光方法的特异性降低-阴道镜检查的特异性为71.4%,而阴道镜检查的特异性为78.6%。在这两种情况下,准确性均为85.4%,有效性为> 80%,这意味着这两种方法均可用于确定高危宫颈上皮内瘤变。该辅助诊断的诊断灵敏度为97.1%,表明它可能是检测高风险变化的最佳选择。结论基于5-ALA的FS是一种客观方法,需要短期给药以进行适当的荧光测量。 FS是一种有前途的诊断工具,其准确性与阴道镜检查相似,但具有提供客观结果的潜在优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号