首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Gastroenterology >Use of hospital resources in the Finnish colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomised health services study
【24h】

Use of hospital resources in the Finnish colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomised health services study

机译:芬兰大肠癌筛查计划中医院资源的使用:一项随机健康服务研究

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo estimate the difference in use of hospital resources in the Finnish Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening programme between those invited and controls, within the year of randomisation and the next year.DesignCRC screening was implemented in Finland in 2004 as a population-based randomised design using biennial faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for men and women aged 60–69?years. Those randomised to screening and control groups during years 2004–2009 were included in this analysis and use of hospital resources was estimated. Data were collected from the national register on hospital discharges. Outpatient visits, inpatient episodes and colonoscopies were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe screening group comprised of 123?149 and control group of 122?930 people. Most people in both groups had not used hospital resources at all. More people in the screening group than in the control group had at least one hospital-based outpatient visit (7.8% vs 7.4%), inpatient episode (3.9% vs 3.8%) and colonoscopy (1.5% vs 1.3%). In total, the screening group had 31?975 and control group 27?061 cumulative outpatient visits, 9260 and 7903 inpatient episodes, and 2686 and 1756 hospital colonoscopies, respectively. The proportion of those with a positive FOBT result with at least one outpatient visit, one inpatient episode or one colonoscopy, was 3.7 times, 2.5 times or 9 times that of those with a negative FOBT result, respectively.ConclusionsCRC screening using the FOBT slightly increased the volume of hospital outpatient visits, inpatient episodes and hospital colonoscopies in Finland.
机译:目的在随机分组之年和次年之间,评估被邀请者和对照组之间在芬兰大肠癌(CRC)筛查计划中医院资源使用的差异.DesignCRC筛查于2004年在芬兰实施,是基于人群的随机设计对60-69岁的男性和女性使用两年一次的粪便潜血试验(FOBT)。这项分析纳入了2004-2009年随机分配给筛查和对照组的患者,并估计了医院资源的使用。数据从国家医院出院登记中收集。比较两组的门诊就诊次数,住院次数和结肠镜检查结果。筛查组为123〜149人,对照组为122〜930人。两组中的大多数人根本没有使用医院资源。至少接受过一次医院门诊就诊(7.8%vs 7.4%),住院发作(3.9%vs 3.8%)和结肠镜检查(1.5%vs 1.3%)的人群超过了筛查组。筛查组总共有31 975例和对照组27 061例累计门诊就诊,9260例和7903例住院病例,以及2686例和1756例医院结肠镜检查。至少一次门诊,一次住院或一次结肠镜检查的FOBT结果阳性的比例分别是FOBT结果阴性的3.7倍,2.5倍或9倍。结论使用FOBT进行的CRC筛查略有增​​加芬兰的医院门诊人次,住院次数和医院结肠镜检查的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号