首页> 外文期刊>BMC Urology >Clinical impact of bladder biopsies with TUR-BT according to cytology results in patients with bladder cancer: a case control study
【24h】

Clinical impact of bladder biopsies with TUR-BT according to cytology results in patients with bladder cancer: a case control study

机译:根据细胞学结果,TUR-BT膀胱活检对膀胱癌患者的临床影响:病例对照研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background There seems to be no consensus concerning taking bladder biopsies during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT). We investigate the clinical significance of bladder biopsy with TUR-BT and the relationship between urinary cytology and the biopsy results. Methods We reviewed a total of 424 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with TUR-BT between 1998 and 2005. Of the total, 293 patients also underwent a bladder biopsy. Biopsies from suspicious-appearing urothelium (N = 59) and those from normal-appearing urothelium (N = 234) were evaluated separately. Results Bladder cancer was observed in 23 cases (39.0%) who underwent a biopsy of suspicious-appearing urothelium. Among these 23 cases, 9 cases with visible tumor resection had carcinoma in situ (CIS) only in the biopsies from suspicious-appearing urothelium. Urinary cytology was negative in 3 of the 9 cases. Bladder cancer was observed in 26 cases (11.1%) who underwent a biopsy of normal-appearing urothelium. Of them, 5 cases with visible tumors had CIS only in the multiple biopsies from normal-appearing urothelium. Urinary cytology was positive in all of the 5 cases. No upstaging or upgrading cases were found in these patients by the addition of these two types of biopsy. Furthermore, therapy was not altered in these patients. With or without bladder biopsy was not a significant factor for tumor recurrence in either the univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions Based on the results, it is concluded the multiple biopsies from normal-appearing urothelium are not necessary in patients with negative cytology results because of the low detection rate and lack of influence on therapeutic decisions. Meanwhile, biopsy of suspicious-appearing urothelium is needed in patients with negative cytology results in order to detect CIS due to staging properties. This result supports a recent EAU guideline.
机译:背景技术关于经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TUR-BT)进行膀胱活检似乎尚未达成共识。我们调查了TUR-BT膀胱活检的临床意义以及泌尿细胞学与活检结果之间的关系。方法我们回顾了1998年至2005年间424例接受TUR-BT治疗的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者。其中293例也接受了膀胱活检。来自可疑出现的尿路上皮的活检(N = 59)和来自正常出现的尿路上皮的活检(N = 234)。结果23例(39.0%)膀胱镜检查发现膀胱癌,发现膀胱癌。在这23例病例中,有9例可见肿瘤切除术,仅在可疑出现的尿路上皮活检中才有原位癌。 9例中有3例尿细胞学检查阴性。在对正常外观的尿路上皮进行活检的26例患者中(11.1%)观察到膀胱癌。其中5例可见肿瘤的CIS仅在正常出现的尿路上皮的多次活检中才具有CIS。在所有5例中,尿细胞学检查均为阳性。通过增加这两种活检,在这些患者中未发现升级或升级病例。此外,这些患者的治疗没有改变。在单变量或多变量分析中,有无膀胱活检都不是肿瘤复发的重要因素。结论基于结果,得出结论:对于细胞学结果阴性的患者,由于其检出率低且对治疗决策的影响较小,因此无需对正常出现的尿路上皮进行多次活检。同时,对于细胞学检查结果为阴性的患者,需要对可疑出现的尿路上皮进行活检,以便根据分期特性检测CIS。该结果支持最新的EAU指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号