首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Podiatry intervention versus usual care to prevent falls in care homes: pilot randomised controlled trial (the PIRFECT study)
【24h】

Podiatry intervention versus usual care to prevent falls in care homes: pilot randomised controlled trial (the PIRFECT study)

机译:足病干预与常规护理相结合以防止护理院倒塌:飞行员随机对照试验(PIRFECT研究)

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Common foot problems are independent risk factors for falls in older people. There is evidence that podiatry can prevent falls in community-dwelling populations. The feasibility of implementing a podiatry intervention and trial in the care home population is unknown. To inform a potential future definitive trial, we performed a pilot randomised controlled trial to assess: (i) the feasibility of a trial of a podiatry intervention to reduce care home falls, and (ii) the potential direction and magnitude of the effect of the intervention in terms of number of falls in care home residents. Methods Informed by Medical Research Council guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions, we conducted a single blind, pilot randomised controlled trial in six care homes in the East of Scotland. Participants were randomised to either: (i) a three month podiatry intervention comprising core podiatry care, foot and ankle exercises, orthoses and footwear provision or (ii) usual care. Falls-related outcomes (number of falls, time to first fall) and feasibility-related outcomes (recruitment, retention, adherence, data collection rates) were collected. Secondary outcomes included: generic health status, balance, mobility, falls efficacy, and ankle joint strength. Results 474 care home residents were screened. 43 (9.1%) participants were recruited: 23 to the intervention, 20 to control. Nine (21%) participants were lost to follow-up due to declining health or death. It was feasible to deliver the trial elements in the care home setting. 35% of participants completed the exercise programme. 48% reported using the orthoses ‘all or most of the time’. Completion rates of the outcome measures were between 93% and 100%. No adverse events were reported. At the nine month follow-up period, the intervention group per-person fall rate was 0.77 falls vs. 0.83 falls in the control group. Conclusions A podiatry intervention to reduce falls can be delivered to care home residents within a pilot randomised controlled trial of the intervention. Although not powered to determine effectiveness, these preliminary data provide justification for a larger trial, incorporating a full process evaluation, to determine whether this intervention can significantly reduce falls in this high-risk population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02178527 ; Date of registration: 17 June 2014.
机译:背景技术常见的脚部问题是老年人跌倒的独立危险因素。有证据表明,足病治疗可以防止社区居民数量下降。在疗养院人群中实施足病干预和试验的可行性尚不清楚。为了为将来可能进行的确定性试验提供信息,我们进行了一项试验性随机对照试验,以评估:(i)进行足病治疗以减少护理院摔倒的试验的可行性,以及(ii)可能的方向和效果的程度在护理院居民跌倒次数方面进行干预。方法在医学研究理事会关于开发和评估复杂干预措施的指导下,我们在苏格兰东部的六个疗养院进行了一项单盲,随机,随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配至:(i)为期三个月的足病干预,包括核心足病护理,足踝锻炼,矫形器和鞋类护理或(ii)常规护理。收集与跌倒相关的结果(跌倒次数,第一次跌倒的时间)和与可行性相关的结果(招聘,保留,坚持,数据收集率)。次要结果包括:一般健康状况,平衡,活动能力,跌倒疗效和踝关节强度。结果筛选了474名养老院居民。招募了43名(9.1%)参与者:23名参加了干预,20名参加了控制。 9名(21%)参与者由于健康或死亡人数下降而失去随访。在护理院环境中提供试验要素是可行的。 35%的参与者完成了锻炼计划。 48%的人表示“全部或大部分时间”使用矫形器。结果指标的完成率在93%至100%之间。没有不良反应的报道。在9个月的随访期中,干预组的人均跌倒率为0.77,而对照组为0.83。结论减少跌倒的足病干预可以在一项干预性试验的随机对照试验中交付给护理院居民。尽管这些初步数据无法确定有效性,但它们为进行较大规模的试验(包括完整的过程评估)提供了依据,以确定这种干预措施是否可以显着减少高危人群的跌倒风险。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02178527;注册日期:2014年6月17日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号