首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Quality >Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme
【24h】

Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme

机译:在基于人群的大肠癌筛查程序中使用免疫化学粪便潜血测试对标本流执行故障模式和效果分析:米兰大肠癌筛查程序中的质量改进项目

获取原文
       

摘要

Background A multidisciplinary working group applied the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) approach to the flow of kits and specimens for the first-level test of a colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. Methods HFMEA comprised four steps: (1) identification and mapping of the process steps (subprocesses); (2) analysis of failure modes and calculation of the risk priority numbers (RPNs); (3) identification of corrective actions; and (4) follow-up and evaluation of corrective actions. Results The team identified 9 main failure modes, 12 effects and 34 associated causes. RPN scores ranged from 2 to 96. Failure modes within the first five positions in the ranking list ordered by RPN concerned: ‘degraded haemoglobin in the specimen’, ‘mixed-up kits’ and ‘anonymous specimen’. All of these could lead to false-negative results and/or subjects with positive tests not being recalled for assessment. The team planned corrective actions for those failure modes. As a result, the follow-up of corrective actions showed a significant decrease in the proportion of anonymous kits from 11.6 to 4.8 per 1000 (relative reduction of 59%). The HFMEA exercise led to a reduction in: missed positive tests; missed cancer and high-risk adenomas; complaints about the communication of test results to a person who never did the test; and false-negative results due either to haemoglobin degradation or an expired sampling tube. Conclusions HFMEA is a useful tool for reducing errors in colorectal cancer screening programmes using faecal occult blood tests and is characterised by a straightforward interpretation of results and ease of communication to healthcare managers and decision makers.
机译:背景技术一个多学科工作组将医疗保健失败模式和影响分析(HFMEA)方法应用于试剂盒和标本流程,以使用免疫化学粪便潜血测试对大肠癌筛查程序进行一级测试。方法HFMEA包括四个步骤:(1)识别和映射过程步骤(子过程); (2)分析故障模式并计算风险优先级数(RPN); (3)识别纠正措施; (4)跟踪和评估纠正措施。结果团队确定了9种主要故障模式,12种影响和34种相关原因。 RPN评分范围从2到96。在由RPN排序的排名列表的前五个位置中,失败模式为:“标本中的血红蛋白降解”,“混合试剂盒”和“匿名标本”。所有这些都可能导致假阴性结果和/或没有召回阳性测试的受试者被召回进行评估。团队针对这些故障模式计划了纠正措施。结果,对纠正措施的跟踪显示匿名试剂盒的比例从每1000的11.6降低到4.8(相对减少了59%)。 HFMEA练习导致以下方面的减少:错过了阳性测试;漏诊癌症和高危腺瘤;有关向从未参加过测试的人传达测试结果的投诉;以及由于血红蛋白降解或采样管过期而导致的假阴性结果。结论HFMEA是减少粪便潜血测试在大肠癌筛查程序中减少错误的有用工具,其特点是对结果的直接解释以及与医疗保健管理者和决策者的易于沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号