...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Genetics >Evaluation of fecal samples as a valid source of DNA by comparing paired blood and fecal samples from American bison ( Bison bison )
【24h】

Evaluation of fecal samples as a valid source of DNA by comparing paired blood and fecal samples from American bison ( Bison bison )

机译:通过比较配对的美洲野牛(Bison bison)的血液和粪便样本来评价粪便样本作为DNA的有效来源

获取原文
           

摘要

The collection and analysis of fecal DNA is a common practice, especially when dealing with wildlife species that are difficult to track or capture. While fecal DNA is known to be lower quality than traditional sources of DNA, such as blood or other tissues, few investigations have verified fecal samples as a valid source of DNA by directly comparing the results to high quality DNA samples from the same individuals. Our goal was to compare DNA from fecal and blood samples from the same 50 American plains bison (Bison bison) from Yellowstone National Park, analyze 35 short tandem repeat (STR) loci for genotyping efficiency, and compare heterozygosity estimates. We discovered that some of the fecal-derived genotypes obtained were significantly different from the blood-derived genotypes from the same bison. We also found that fecal-derived DNA samples often underestimated heterozygosity values, in some cases by over 20%. These findings highlight a potential shortcoming inherent in previous wildlife studies that relied solely on a multi-tube approach, using exclusively low quality fecal DNA samples with no quality control to account for false alleles and allelic dropout. Herein, we present a rigorous marker selection protocol that is applicable for a wide range of species and report a set of 15 STR markers for use in future bison studies that yielded consistent results from both fecal and blood-derived DNA.
机译:粪便DNA的收集和分析是一种常见的做法,尤其是在处理难以追踪或捕获的野生生物物种时。虽然已知粪便DNA的质量要比传统的DNA来源(例如血液或其他组织)低,但很少有研究通过直接将结果与同一个人的高质量DNA样本进行比较来证明粪便样品是DNA的有效来源。我们的目标是比较来自黄石国家公园的同一50个美国平原野牛(Bison野牛)的粪便和血液样本中的DNA,分析35个短串联重复序列(STR)位点的基因分型效率,并比较杂合性估计。我们发现,获得的一些粪便来源的基因型与同一个野牛的血液来源的基因型显着不同。我们还发现,粪便来源的DNA样品常常低估了杂合度值,在某些情况下降低了20%以上。这些发现凸显了以前仅依靠多管方法进行野生生物研究的潜在缺陷,该研究仅使用低质量的粪便DNA样品,而没有质量控制来解决假等位基因和等位基因缺失的问题。在本文中,我们提出了适用于广泛物种的严格标记选择方案,并报告了一组15种STR标记,可用于未来的野牛研究,这些研究从粪便和血液来源的DNA中产生一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号