首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Using theory to explore facilitators and barriers to delayed prescribing in Australia: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel
【24h】

Using theory to explore facilitators and barriers to delayed prescribing in Australia: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel

机译:利用理论探索促成澳大利亚延迟开处方的障碍和障碍:使用理论领域框架和行为改变轮的定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Delayed antibiotic prescribing reduces antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in trials in general practice, but the uptake in clinical practice is low. The aim of the study was to identify facilitators and barriers to general practitioners’ (GPs’) use of delayed prescribing and to gain pharmacists’ and the public’s views about delayed prescribing in Australia. Methods This study used the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel to explore facilitators and barriers to delayed prescribing in Australia. Forty-three semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with general practitioners, pharmacists and patients were conducted. Responses were coded into domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework, and specific criteria from the Behaviour Change Wheel were used to identify which domains were relevant to increasing the use of delayed prescribing by GPs. Results The interviews revealed nine key domains that influence GPs’ use of delayed prescribing: knowledge; cognitive and interpersonal skills; memory, attention and decision-making processes; optimism; beliefs about consequences; intentions; goals; emotion; and social influences: GPs knew about delayed prescribing; however, they did not use it consistently, preferring to bring patients back for review and only using it with patients in a highly selective way. Pharmacists would support GPs and the public in delayed prescribing but would fill the prescription if people insisted. The public said they would delay taking their antibiotics if asked by their GP and given the right information on managing symptoms and when to take antibiotics. Conclusions Using a theory-driven approach, we identified nine key domains that influence GPs’ willingness to provide a delayed prescription to patients with an acute respiratory infection presenting to general practice. These data can be used to develop a structured intervention to change this behaviour and thus reduce antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in general practice.
机译:背景技术在一般实践中,延迟处方抗生素可减少用于急性呼吸道感染的抗生素使用量,但临床实践中的吸收率很低。这项研究的目的是找出促进全科医生使用延期开药的便利因素和障碍,并获得药剂师和公众对于澳大利亚延期开药的看法。方法:本研究使用“理论领域框架”和“行为改变轮”来探讨促进澳大利亚延迟开处方的促进因素和障碍。与全科医生,药剂师和患者进行了四十三次半结构化的面对面访谈。将响应编码到“理论领域框架”的领域中,并使用“行为改变轮”中的特定标准来确定哪些领域与增加GP延迟处方的使用有关。结果访谈揭示了影响GP延迟处方使用的9个关键领域:知识;认知和人际交往能力;记忆,注意力和决策过程;乐观;对后果的信念;意图目标;感情;和社会影响:全科医生知道开处方延迟;但是,他们并没有始终如一地使用它,而是希望将患者带回去进行检查,并且仅以高度选择性的方式将其与患者一起使用。药剂师将支持全科医生和公众延迟开药,但如果人们坚持,将开处方。公众表示,如果他们的全科医生要求,并且在管理症状和何时服用抗生素方面提供了正确的信息,他们将推迟服用抗生素。结论使用理论驱动的方法,我们确定了九个关键领域,这些领域影响了全科医生向急诊呼吸道感染的患者提供延迟处方的意愿,而急性呼吸道感染的患者应遵循常规做法。这些数据可用于制定结构性干预措施,以改变这种行为,从而减少一般实践中急性呼吸道感染的抗生素使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号