...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Out of hours care: a profile analysis of patients attending the emergency department and the general practitioner on call
【24h】

Out of hours care: a profile analysis of patients attending the emergency department and the general practitioner on call

机译:非工作时间护理:对急诊患者和急诊全科医生的资料分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Overuse of emergency departments (ED) is of concern in Western society and it is often referred to as 'inappropriate' use. This phenomenon may compromise efficient use of health care personnel, infrastructure and financial resources of the ED. To redirect patients, an extensive knowledge of the experiences and attitudes of patients and their choice behaviour is necessary. The aim of this study is to quantify the patients and socio-economical determinants for choosing the general practitioner (GP) on call or the ED. Methods Data collection was conducted simultaneously in 4 large cities in Belgium. All patients who visited EDs or used the services of the GP on call during two weekends in January 2005 were enrolled in the study in a prospective manner. We used semi-structured questionnaires to interview patients from both services. Results 1611 patient contacts were suitable for further analysis. 640 patients visited the GP and 971 went to the ED. Determinants that associated with the choice of the ED are: being male, having visited the ED during the past 12 months at least once, speaking another language than Dutch or French, being of African (sub-Saharan as well as North African) nationality and no medical insurance. We also found that young men are more likely to seek help at the ED for minor trauma, compared to women. Conclusions Patients tend to seek help at the service they are acquainted with. Two populations that distinctively seek help at the ED for minor medical problems are people of foreign origin and men suffering minor trauma. Aiming at a redirection of patients, special attention should go to these patients. Informing them about the health services' specific tasks and the needlessness of technical examinations for minor trauma, might be a useful intervention.
机译:背景技术紧急情况部门(ED)的过度使用是西方社会关注的问题,通常被称为“不当使用”。这种现象可能会危及急诊室医疗人员,基础设施和财务资源的有效利用。要重定向患者,必须对患者的经验和态度及其选择行为有广泛的了解。这项研究的目的是量化患者和社会经济决定因素,以选择急诊医生或急诊科的全科医生。方法在比利时的四个大城市同时进行数据收集。在2005年1月的两个周末期间,所有拜访急诊科或就诊时使用全科医生服务的患者均以前瞻性方式参加了研究。我们使用半结构化问卷调查了两种服务的患者。结果1611名患者接触者适合进一步分析。 640名患者去了GP,971名去了急诊。与选择急诊室有关的决定因素有:男性,在过去的12个月中至少访问过一次急诊室,说荷兰语或法语以外的另一种语言,具有非洲(撒哈拉以南和北非)国籍和没有医疗保险。我们还发现,与女性相比,年轻男性更有可能在急诊室就轻度创伤寻求帮助。结论患者倾向于在他们熟悉的服务中寻求帮助。外籍人士和遭受轻度创伤的人是在急诊部就轻微医疗问题寻求帮助的两个人群。为了重定向患者,应该特别注意这些患者。将健康服务的具体任务告知他们,以及对轻微创伤进行技术检查的必要性可能是有用的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号