首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Symptom or faecal immunochemical test based referral criteria for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients: a diagnostic tests study
【24h】

Symptom or faecal immunochemical test based referral criteria for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients: a diagnostic tests study

机译:基于症状或粪便免疫化学测试的有症状患者大肠癌检测的推荐标准:诊断测试研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Symptom based referral criteria for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection are the cornerstone of the strategy to improve prognosis in CRC. In 2017, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated their referral criteria (2017 NG12). Recently, several studies have evaluated the faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration in this setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 2017 NG12 referral criteria and to compare them with the CG27 referral criteria, the f-Hb concentration and two f-Hb based prediction model: COLONPREDICT and FAST Score. This is a post-hoc diagnostic test study performed within the COLONPREDICT study database (1572 patients, CRC prevalence 13.6%). We assessed symptoms, the 2017 NG12 and CG27 referral criteria and determined the f-Hb before performing a colonoscopy. We compared the discriminatory ability using the area under the curve (AUC) and the sensitivity and specificity at pre-stablished thresholds with the McNemar’s test. The 2017 NG12 referral criteria discriminatory ability (AUC 0.53; 95% confidence interval- CI 0.49–0.57) was inferior to the CG27 version (AUC 0.59; 95% CI 0.55–0.63; p?=?0.01), the f-Hb concentration (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.84–0-89; p??0.001), the COLONPREDICT Score (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.91–0.94; p??0.001) or the FAST Score (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.85–0.89; p??0.001). The number of patients meeting each criteria were as follows: 2017 NG12 and CG27?=?94.1% and 52.2%; f-Hb ≥20 and?≥?10?μg/g faeces?=?38.6 and 44.3%; COLONPREDICT Score?≥?5.6 and?≥?3.2?=?29.4 and 63.2% and FAST Score?≥?4.50 and?≥?2.12?=?37.1 and 87.0%. The 2017 NG12 criteria were more sensitive (100%) than the CG27 criteria (68.2%), the f-Hb (≥20?μg/g) (91.2%), the f-Hb (≥10?μg/g) (93.5%), the COLONPREDICT Score (≥5.6) (90.1%) and the FAST Score (≥4.50) (89.8%) (p?≤?0.001) and equivalent to the COLONPREDICT Score (≥3.5) (99.5%) or the FAST Score (≥2.12) (100.0%) (p?=?1). However, their specificity (6.8%) was significantly lower than any of the evaluated criteria (50.3%, 69.6%, 63.4%, 78.7%, 45.8%, 71.3%, 13.9%; p??0.001). Referral criteria based on f-Hb measurement, either as a single test or within prediction models, are more accurate than symptom-based referral criteria for CRC detection in symptomatic patients.
机译:基于症状的大肠癌(CRC)检测参考标准是改善CRC预后的策略的基石。 2017年,美国国立卫生研究院(NICE)更新了他们的推荐标准(2017 NG12)。最近,一些研究评估了这种情况下的粪便血红蛋白(f-Hb)浓度。这项研究的目的是评估2017年NG12推荐标准的诊断准确性,并将其与CG27推荐标准,f-Hb浓度和两种基于f-Hb的预测模型进行比较:COLONPREDICT和FAST Score。这是在COLONPREDICT研究数据库中进行的事后诊断测试研究(1572名患者,CRC患病率为13.6%)。我们在进行结肠镜检查之前评估症状,2017 NG12和CG27推荐标准并确定f-Hb。我们将曲线下面积(AUC)的区分能力与预先设定的阈值下的敏感性和特异性与McNemar检验进行了比较。 2017年NG12推荐标准的判别能力(AUC 0.53; 95%置信区间-CI 0.49–0.57)不如CG27版本(AUC 0.59; 95%CI 0.55–0.63; p?=?0.01),f-Hb浓度(AUC 0.86; 95%CI 0.84-0-89; p <0.001),COLONPREDICT得分(AUC 0.92; 95%CI 0.91-0.94; p <0.001)或FAST得分(AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.89; p <0.001)。满足每个标准的患者人数如下:2017 NG12和CG27≥94.1%和52.2%; f-Hb≥20且≥10μg/ g粪便≥38.6和44.3%; COLONPREDICT得分≥5.6,≥3.2≥29.4和63.2%,FAST得分≥4.50,≥2.12≥37.1和87.0%。 2017年NG12标准比CG27标准(68.2%),f-Hb(≥20?μg/ g)(91.2%),f-Hb(≥10?μg/ g)敏感(100%)( 93.5%),COLONPREDICT分数(≥5.6)(90.1%)和FAST分数(≥4.50)(89.8%)(p?≤0.001),并且等于COLONPREDICT分数(≥3.5)(99.5%)或FAST分数(≥2.12)(100.0%)(p?=?1)。但是,它们的特异性(6.8%)明显低于任何评价的标准(50.3%,69.6%,63.4%,78.7%,45.8%,71.3%,13.9%;p≤0.001)。无论是在单一测试中还是在预测模型中,基于f-Hb测量的推荐标准都比有症状患者CRC检测的基于症状的推荐标准更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号