...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Organisation of services for people with cardiovascular disorders in primary care: transfer to primary care or to specialist-generalist multidisciplinary teams?
【24h】

Organisation of services for people with cardiovascular disorders in primary care: transfer to primary care or to specialist-generalist multidisciplinary teams?

机译:为初级保健中的心血管疾病患者组织服务:转移到初级保健或专科医生领域的多学科团队?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background An ageing population and high levels of multimorbidity increase rates of GP and specialist consultations. Constraints on health care funding are leading to additional pressure for the adoption of safe and cost-effective alternatives to specialist care, in some cases by shifting services to primary care. Discussion In this paper we argue, having searched for evidence on approaches to shifting care for some people with cardiovascular problems from secondary to primary care, that a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach is required to achieve high quality outcomes from cardiovascular care in the primary care setting. Simply transferring patients from specialist care to management by primary care teams is likely to lead to worse outcomes than services that involve both specialists and primary care teams together, in planned and effectively managed systems of care. The care of patients with certain chronic conditions in the community, if appropriately organised, can achieve the same health outcomes as ambulatory care by hospital specialists. However, shared care by GPs and specialists for patients with chronic heart failure after discharge from hospital can deliver better patient survival. The existing models of shared care include specialists working in an ambulatory care setting (in Central and Eastern Europe) or in hospital based outreach clinics, and cardiology care organised by GPs in the UK and Australia, which have demonstrated reductions in referral rates. Summary Current research supports the idea of the management of certain chronic health conditions in primary care based on the integration of GPs and specialists into multidisciplinary teams, based on availability of reliable evidence about cost-effectiveness, health care outcomes, patient preference and incentives for GPs. Evaluation of such schemes is mandatory, however, to ensure that the expected benefits do materialise.
机译:背景技术人口老龄化和高发病率增加了全科医生和专科医生的诊治率。卫生保健资金的约束正导致在采用安全且具成本效益的专业治疗替代方案方面承受更大的压力,在某些情况下,服务转向初级保健。讨论在本文中,我们寻求了一些心血管疾病患者从二级保健转向初级保健的护理方法的证据,认为在初级保健环境中需要一种协作,多学科的方法来实现高质量的心血管保健结果。与在计划和有效管理的护理系统中将专家和初级护理团队共同参与的服务相比,将患者从初级护理团队转移到专业护理团队可能会导致更糟糕的结果。如果组织得当,对社区中患有某些慢性病的患者的护理可以达到与医院专家的门诊一样的健康结果。但是,全科医生和专科医生对出院后患有慢性心力衰竭的患者进行共同护理可以提高患者的生存率。现有的共享医疗模式包括在门诊医疗环境(在中欧和东欧)或在医院的门诊诊所工作的专家,以及由英国和澳大利亚的全科医生组成的心脏病学护理,这表明转诊率有所降低。总结当前的研究支持基于将全科医生和专家整合到多学科团队的基础上,基于关于成本效益,医疗保健结果,患者偏爱和对全科医生的激励措施的可靠证据,来管理初级保健中某些慢性健康状况的想法。但是,必须对此类计划进行评估,以确保确实实现预期利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号