...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Patient experiences with family medicine: a longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006
【24h】

Patient experiences with family medicine: a longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006

机译:家庭医学的患者体验:2006年荷兰医疗改革后的纵向研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In 2006 The Dutch Health Care system changed to a market oriented system. The GP remuneration changed from?±?2/3 capitation patients and 1/3 private patients before 2006 to a mixed payment scheme. From 2006 onward every patient was insured and the GP received partly capitation, partly fees for consultations and for specific services. This change coincided with many other organisational changes in General Practice care. Our research question was if during the years after 2006 patient experiences of Dutch family practice had changed. We also wanted to explore the influence of patient and practice characteristics on patient experiences. Data on patient experiences were available from 2007 to 2012. Method In a series of annual cross sectional patient surveys the performance of GPs and practices was measured. Patient sampling took place as a part of the Dutch accreditation program in 1657 practices involving 2966 GPs. Patients’ experiences, gender, age, health status, and number of annual consultations were documented as well as the type and location of practices. Linear regression analysis was used to examine time trends in patient experiences and the impact of patient and practice characteristics. Results 78,985 patients assessed the performance of 2966 GPs, and 45,773 patients assessed the organisation of 1657 practices. The number of patients with positive experiences increased significantly between 2007 and 2012; respectively 4.8?% for GPs (beta 0.20 and p Conclusions In our evaluation of patient experiences with general practice care from 2007 to 2012 we found an increase of 4.8?% for GPs and 6.6?% for practices respectively. This improvement is significant. While no direct causation can be made, possible explanations may be found in the various reforms in Dutch family practice since 2006. More insight is needed into key determinants of this improvement before policymakers and care providers can attribute the improvement to these reforms.
机译:背景信息2006年,荷兰医疗保健系统更改为面向市场的系统。 GP的报酬从2006年之前的±2/3人为圈养患者和1/3私人患者变为混合支付方案。从2006年开始,每位患者都获得了保险,全科医生获得了部分人头,部分咨询和特定服务的费用。这一变化与全科医疗保健中的许多其他组织变化相吻合。我们的研究问题是,在2006年之后的几年中,荷兰家庭实践的患者经历是否发生了变化。我们还想探讨患者和实践特征对患者体验的影响。有关患者经历的数据可从2007年至2012年获得。方法在一系列年度横断面患者调查中,对全科医生的表现和实践进行了测量。患者抽样是1657年荷兰认证计划的一部分,涉及2966名GP。记录患者的经历,性别,年龄,健康状况和年度咨询次数,以及执业类型和地点。线性回归分析用于检查患者经历的时间趋势以及患者和实践特征的影响。结果78,985例患者评估了2966个GP的表现,45,773例患者评估了1657个实践的组织。在2007年至2012年之间,拥有积极经验的患者人数大幅增加; GPs分别为4.8%(β0.20和p)结论在我们对2007年至2012年的全科患者护理经验评估中,GPs分别增加了4.8%和6.6%,这是很明显的。自2006年以来,没有任何直接的因果关系,可能在荷兰家庭实践的各种改革中找到可能的解释。在决策者和护理提供者将这些改进归因于这些改革之前,需要对这种改进的关键决定因素有更多的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号