首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >What do general practitioners think about an online self-regulation programme for health promotion? Focus group interviews
【24h】

What do general practitioners think about an online self-regulation programme for health promotion? Focus group interviews

机译:全科医生对健康促进在线自我调节计划有何看法?焦点小组访谈

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Chronic diseases may be prevented through programmes that promote physical activity and healthy nutrition. Computer-tailoring programmes are effective in changing behaviour in the short- and long-term. An important issue is the implementation of these programmes in general practice. However, there are several barriers that hinder the adoption of eHealth programmes in general practice. This study explored the feasibility of an eHealth programme that was designed, using self-regulation principles. Methods Seven focus group interviews (a total of 62 GPs) were organized to explore GPs’ opinions about the feasibility of the eHealth programme for prevention in general practice. At the beginning of each focus group, GPs were informed about the principles of the self-regulation programme ‘My Plan’. Open-ended questions were used to assess the opinion of GPs about the content and the use of the programme. The focus groups discussions were audio-taped, transcribed and thematically analysed via NVivo software. Results The majority of the GPs was positive about the use of self-regulation strategies and about the use of computer-tailored programmes in general practice. There were contradictory results about the delivery mode of the programme. GPs also indicated that the programme might be less suited for patients with a low educational level or for old patients. Conclusions Overall, GPs are positive about the adoption of self-regulation techniques for health promotion in their practice. However, they raised doubts about the adoption in general practice. This barrier may be addressed (1) by offering various ways to deliver the programme, and (2) by allowing flexibility to match different work flow systems. GPs also believed that the acceptability and usability of the programme was low for patients who are old or with low education. The issues raised by GPs will need to be taken into account when developing and implementing an eHealth programme in general practice.
机译:背景慢性疾病可以通过促进身体活动和健康营养的计划来预防。计算机定制程序可以有效地改变短期和长期的行为。一个重要的问题是在一般实践中如何执行这些程序。但是,有一些障碍阻碍了在一般实践中采用eHealth计划。这项研究探讨了使用自我调节原则设计的eHealth计划的可行性。方法组织了七个焦点小组访谈(总共62个GP),以探讨GP对电子卫生保健计划在一般实践中进行预防的可行性的看法。在每个焦点小组开始时,全科医生都被告知自我调节计划“我​​的计划”的原则。不限成员名额的问题用于评估GP对计划内容和使用的看法。通过NVivo软件对焦点小组的讨论进行了录音,转录和主题分析。结果多数全科医生对自我调节策略的使用以及一般实践中计算机定制程序的使用持肯定态度。关于该方案的交付方式有矛盾的结果。全科医生还指出,该计划可能不太适合教育程度低的患者或老年患者。结论总体而言,全科医生对在实践中采用自我调节技术促进健康表示乐观。但是,他们对一般实践中的采用表示怀疑。可以(1)通过提供各种方式交付程序来解决这一障碍,(2)通过允许灵活性来匹配不同的工作流程系统来解决这一障碍。全科医生还认为,该计划对于年龄较大或教育程度较低的患者的接受度和可用性较低。在一般实践中,在制定和实施电子卫生保健计划时,必须考虑全科医生提出的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号